2017-07-05_REVISION - C1981038 ‎(4)‎

• Permit No: C1981038
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 7/5/2017
• Doc Name Note: Concerned Citizen
• Doc Name: Comment
• From: Richard Rudin
• To: DRMS
• Type & Sequence: PR5
• Email Name: CCW
• Email Name: JRS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

7/6/2017 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail-Fwd Unanswered questions...
STATE
T OR D© DRMS_CoalAdmin -DNR, DNR<[e-mail]>
Fwd: Unanswered questions...
1 message
Wein -DNR, Clayton <[e-mail]> Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:44 PM
To: DNR DRMS_CoalAdmin - DNR<[e-mail]>
Hello Alysha,
The following email chain is regarding a comment from a concerned citizen on Bowie No. 1's PR-5. Please include it in
Laserfiche.
Thank you,
Clayton Wein
Environmental Protection Specialist
P 303.866.3567 x 8144 1 F 303.832.8106
1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203
[e-mail] I http://[e-mail]
---------- Forwarded message----------
From:Wein -DNR, Clayton <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: Unanswered questions...
To: Richard Rudin <[e-mail]>
Sorry that I was not able to send a response to you last Friday on this question. Bowie Resources is liable for the
reclamation of the bridge.
Clayton Wein
Environmental Protection Specialist
taR
P 303.866.3567 x 8144 1 F 303.832.8106
1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203
[e-mail] I http://[e-mail]
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Richard Rudin <[e-mail]>wrote:
Thanks Clayton, ..... is that bridge part of the Adequacy review? ... I ask because you referred to
the price of removal but not whose responsibility ? .. If we are agreed it can't stay put indefinitely.
On Jun 2, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Wein- DNR, Clayton <[e-mail]>wrote:
Hello Rich,
I looked into the Reclamation Cost Estimate (RCE)for the loadout. The railroad bridge is covered in task
202 of the RCE. We have included the questions and concerns about the 4,600 volt electric line in our
https:Hmail.google.com/mail/b/Alk_JgZm6Fl svK5zcW RuU Dfyk90-1 GcFethCOkimz7HRx3BmvXX/u/O/?ui=2&ik=deb7fOcd20&tsver--7BEi lyElYTQ.en.&... 1/2