My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-06-26_HYDROLOGY - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2017-06-26_HYDROLOGY - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2020 1:25:58 AM
Creation date
6/28/2017 10:03:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
6/26/2017
Doc Name
Demonstration of Compliance with WQCC Regulation No 41
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Data <br /> Results of chemical analyses of water samples taken from the wells were extracted from the CC&V <br /> environmental monitoring database and reviewed as spreadsheets. Table 2 provides a general overview <br /> of the data. <br /> Table 2: Overview of groundwater monitoring well data. <br /> Drainage No. of Earliest Analyses General Comments <br /> Wells Sample Pre 1/31/94 <br /> Arequa 2 12/7/93 2 each well 17 and 33%of samples below detection for manganese <br /> and Zn <br /> Grassy 4 7/16/98 Zinc always below detection,5-81%of samples below <br /> detection for Mn <br /> Vindicator 2 6/30/04 31 and 100%of samples below detection for Zn <br /> Wilson Ck. 2 3/15/92 6,WCMW 3-134 2 and 47%of samples below detection for manganese, <br /> 2,WCMW 6-234 81 and 97%for Zn <br /> Squaw 4 9/25/14 3 wells are essentially always dry, limited samples from <br /> SGMW 6B-60 <br /> Poverty 2 1 /31/00 1 Dry except for 2000 and 2001 <br /> Tables 3 and 4 present summary statistics for each sampling location; Table 3 has the data for sulfate <br /> and field pH, Table 4 has the data for manganese and zinc. The data shown in Tables 3 and 4 generally <br /> indicate significant variability in the analytical results for any given sampling location, with the exception of <br /> the data for Vindicator Valley. Figure 3 shows the sulfate concentration data for the Arequa Gulch <br /> monitoring wells as an example of sample-to-sample variability. <br /> Table 3: Summary statistics for sulfate and pH data used in the present analysis (S.D. is standard <br /> deviation, Max. is maximum, Min. is minimum, n is the number of samples with results above the <br /> detection limit, N.D. is not detected). <br /> Sulfate m /L Field pH <br /> Drainage Well Geomean S.D. Max Min n Geomean S.D. Max Min n <br /> Arequa CRMW 3A-35 745 184 1260 424 120 6.25 0.20 6.88 5.25 123 <br /> CRMW 3B-63 765 141 1130 200 140 6.73 0.16 7.09 6.13 139 <br /> Geomean 755 260 6.49 262 <br /> Grassy GVMW 8A-250 68 8 107 51 87 7.26 0.59 10.8 6.87 92 <br /> GVMW 8B-50 96 44 246 53 75 6.84 0.41 8.84 6.17 88 <br /> GVMW 22A-70 49 22 1 161 39 1 29 1 7.84 0.24 8.29 1 7.02 39 <br /> GVMW 22B-30 70 17 104 27 28 6.71 0.21 7.17 6.19 28 <br /> Geomean 69 219 7.15 247 <br /> Vindicator VIN 2A-270 705 26 760 662 13 7.25 0.13 7.50 7.05 58 <br /> VIN 213-140 718 55 792 548 26 7.20 0.11 7.56 6.94 100 <br /> Geomean 711 39 7.22 158 <br /> Wilson WCMW 3-134 21 5 44 12 127 7.69 0.15 8.14 6.84 131 <br /> WCMW 6-234 56 8 1 80 39 1 92 7.03 0.13 7.52 1 6.70 90 <br /> Geomean 34 219 7.35 221 <br /> Squaw SGMW 613-60 971 80 1140 873 10 6.47 0.20 6.83 6.12 14 <br /> Poverty PGMW 1A-200 521 6 529 513 6 6.56 1.50 10.28 4.52 13 <br /> PGMW 1B-55 285 57 401 226 9 3.68 0.27 4.36 3.41 14 <br /> Geomean 362 1 1 1 4.87 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.