My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-06-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2017-06-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2022 5:31:28 PM
Creation date
6/28/2017 6:27:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
6/7/2017
Doc Name
Vegetation Survey
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.04.10
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
line 180 degrees. Where the 50 -meter tape could not be placed within a narrow vegetation <br />polygon due to boundary constraints, then the transect alignment was changed 90 degrees at the <br />point where the boundary line was crossed to ensure that the entire transect alignment was <br />located within the area to be sampled. <br />Plant Cover <br />Plant cover was evaluated by randomly sampling ten previously identified intervals along the <br />outstretched 50 -meter transect tape. At each designated sample point, an inclined metal ten -point <br />frame, one meter in height was positioned perpendicular to the tape and a sharpened metal rod <br />was dropped. Each designated interval was sampled at approximately ten -centimeter intervals <br />along the ten -point frame. Even transect random numbers were sampled on the right-hand side of <br />the tape and odd numbers were sampled on the left-hand side of the tape. <br />In the wetland vegetation type, due to the long, often linear alignment of these polygons, where <br />the transect alignment would have resulted in multiple bends in the 50 meter transect tape, a <br />shorter 5 meter transect length was used. In these instances, the random sample intervals <br />generated for the 50 meter transect length were converted to decimeters. <br />Each observation was recorded as to the specific plant species encountered as the sharpened rod <br />was dropped. If no plant cover was encountered, then the observation was recorded as to the <br />presence of plant litter, rock, bare ground, lichens or cryptograms. Plant material produced in <br />the 2009 growing season which was still attached to the plant was considered as living plant <br />material and the dead plant material which had fallen to the ground was considered to be litter. <br />The 100 data points collected along each transect were then summarized into a single datum for <br />purposes of statistical analysis. Absolute and relative plant cover, species diversity, and plant life <br />forms were determined based upon the observations collected in sampling the plant cover. <br />Production <br />Along the transect alignment described for plant cover, three randomly located circular one- <br />quarter square meter plots were clipped along each vegetation transect line. These plots were <br />clipped by life forms for perennial grasses and perennial forbs. As found in the requirements of <br />Rule 4.15.11, shrub, subshrubs, annuals and noxious weeds were not clipped, since they cannot <br />count toward revegetation production success standards. The production samples were taken <br />along the same transect used for cover and shrub density sampling. The three clip plots were <br />then averaged into a single transect datum for purposes of statistical analysis. For each area <br />sampled, a minimum of 30 production transects were used for sample adequacy calculations. <br />Section 2.04.10 Page 7 of 36 June 2016 (TR -14) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.