My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-06-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2017-06-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2022 5:31:28 PM
Creation date
6/28/2017 6:27:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
6/7/2017
Doc Name
Vegetation Survey
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.04.10
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
total relative cover found on this area. Noxious weeds contributed 8.18 percent of the total plant <br />cover and 11.57 percent of the total relative cover found on this area. Native shrubs contributed <br />0.73 percent of the total plant cover and 1.03 percent of the total relative cover found on this <br />area. Annuals and biennials contributed 0.20 percent of the total plant cover and 0.28 percent of <br />the total relative cover found on this site. Alfalfa, a planted introduced perennial forb was the <br />most dominant plant species encountered, contributing 22.87 percent of the total relative plant <br />cover found on this site. The other dominant plants encountered were: Smooth Bromegrass, Tall <br />Fescue, Orchardgrass and Kentucky Bluegrass which contributed 16.21, 13.27, 12.21 and 5.42 <br />percent, respectively, of the total relative cover on this area. <br />The locations of the 40 cover transects sampled in the Irrigated Pasture predisturbance area are <br />shown on Map 2.04.10-1. The sample adequacy calculations in Table 2.04.10-2, document that <br />the number of samples required to describe this site at the 90 percent confidence interval was 2.7 <br />transects. <br />Production <br />The results obtained from the sampling of 69 production transects on this area are summarized in <br />Table 2.04.10- 10. This table shows that the herbaceous forage production equaled 92.18 g/1/4 <br />m2 or 3,285.3 pounds of air dry -dry forage per acre. Perennial grasses contributed 64.98 g/l/4 m2 <br />or 70.49 percent of the herbaceous forage produced. Perennial forbs, contributed 27.20 g/l/4 m2 <br />or 29.51 percent of the herbaceous forage production. <br />The locations of the 69 production transects sampled for this site are shown on Map 2.04.10-1. <br />The sample adequacy calculations in Table 2.04.10-2, document that the number of samples <br />required to describe this site at the 90 percent confidence interval was 41.8 transects. <br />Shrub Density <br />The shrub density counts obtained from the 15 belt transects sampled in this vegetation type are <br />summarized in Table 2.04.10-11. The average shrub density was determined to equal 1.63 shrubs <br />per one hundred square meters or 65.9 shrubs per acre. Sandbar Willow, Nutka Rose, Russian <br />Olive, Rubber Rabbitbrush, Siberian Elm and River Hawthorn were the only shrubs encountered. <br />The locations of the 15 shrub density transects sampled in the Irrigated Pasture predisturbance <br />area are shown on Map 2.04.10-1. Examination of the sample adequacy calculations in Table <br />2.04.10-2, reveals the number of samples required to describe the shrub density on this area at <br />the 90 percent confidence interval was 679.9 transects. <br />Section 2.04. 10 Page 18 of 36 June 2016 (TR -14) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.