2017-06-21_REVISION - M1990041

• Permit No: M1990041
• IBM Index Class Name: REVISION
• Doc Date: 6/21/2017
• Doc Name: Decision Date Extension Request
• From: Black Fox Mining LLC
• To: DRMS
• Email Name: MAC
• Email Name: WHE
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Linkedln public profile: nttq:i/www.IlnKedin.com/pup/matt-cotiins/i o,8oai6p/
Need to send me a large file? Please use this URL: https:i/www.hightail.com/u/MattCollins
This email transmission is confidential and may contain proprietary information for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s).
Copying,distribution or other use of this transmission,other than by the intended recipient(s),is strictly prohibited.If you are not
the intended recipient,please delete all copies and as a professional courtesy notify the sender.Also,be aware that electronic
media such as email and attachments are susceptible to unauthorized modification,deterioration,and incompatibility.
Consequently,electronic media should not be relied upon.
From:Vince Harris[mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 9:15 AM
To: '[e-mail]'<[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Cynthia Linker'<[e-mail] >; Ethan Watel<[e-mail]>;Janice Beecher
([e-mail] )<[e-mail]>;Julie Esterl<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Bates-Hunter Mine, Golden Gilpin Mill
Importance: High
Good morning Matt. To quicken up a response to you I am simply putting information in this email response.
We can definitely provide you another letter, but we cannot at this time or even possibly later have the letter say"it is in
conformance with the local Zoning Ordinances'". So, another letter today will simply state it is not know yet if it complies
with the local zoning regulations. We don't even know where the property lines are in relationship to the property
improvements on the parcel. Until an Improvement Location Survey(ILS) is prepared that shows the improvements and
the property lines etc, and we can review that survey against the Zoning regulations attributed to the Environmental
Character Preservation (ECP)Zone District standards we can't provide any type of letter addressing the issue(s). If by
chance all the buildings do comply with the ECP Zoning standard's we can state it meets Zoning District standards
(however- I am doubting that it will comply with all the Zoning Standard's), and the use is still subject to a Special
Review Use (SRU) Permit. Once that(SRU) application is submitted, it goes thru the regular review process and the
Board of Aldermen are the decision makers on an approval or denial of a SRU application. This SRU explanation is in the
letter we sent to you on February 10 (attached again for your reference). Those explanations are in the letter at the end
of page 2 and on page 3. There are 3 bulleted items with the explanations.
I recognize that this answer is not your preferred answer, but we simply can't just write a conformance letter(or lack of
conformance letter) until we know where property lines are and improvements are on the property. I am more than
happy to further discuss this with you and please contact me if you have more questions.
Thanks Matt.
Best regards,
VINCENT HARRIS, AICP I Planning Director, Golden I Baseline Engineering, Planning, & Surveying I
Corporate Headquarters: 1950 Ford Street I Golden, CO 80401 1 Phone: [phone] x217 I Fax: [phone] ( Cell:
303.912.1900 1 www.baselinecorf).com
From:Julie Esterl
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 10:24 AM
To:Vince Harris
3