My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-06-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2017-06-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2017 8:38:10 AM
Creation date
6/22/2017 7:24:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/5/2017
Doc Name Note
(Revised) RN6
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company, LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
RDZ
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
New Elk Coal Company, LLC does not control and has not controlled mining operations <br />with a demonstrated pattern of willful violations of the Act of such nature, duration, and <br />with such resulting irreparable damage to the environment as to indicate an intent not to <br />comply with the provisions of the Act (2.07.6(2)(h)). <br />9. The Division finds that surface coal mining and reclamation operations to be performed <br />under this permit will not be inconsistent with other such operations anticipated to be <br />performed in areas adjacent to the permit area (2.07.6(2)(i)). <br />10. The Division estimates the reclamation liability for mining operations in this permit term <br />to be $4,034,998.07 (based on reclamation cost estimate performed during the midterm <br />review of 2016 (MT -07). The Division currently holds $4,133,137.02 in performance <br />bonds for the New Elk Mine. NECC need not submit an additional performance bond <br />prior to issuance of a renewed permit (2.07.6(2)(j)). <br />11. The Division has made a negative determination for the presence of prime farmland within <br />the permit area. The decision was based on a letter from the Soil Conservation Service <br />dated October 24, 1980 that demonstrates that no prime farmland mapping units are found <br />within the permit area (2.07.6(2)(k)). <br />12. Based on information provided in the application, the Division has determined that two <br />alluvial valley floors exist within the permit or adjacent area. These alluvial valley floors <br />are located within the Stonewall Valley and the Picketwire Valley. A thorough description <br />of these alluvial valley floors, and the impacts on them due to mining at New Elk, is found <br />in Section VIII of the January 11, 1989 Findings of Compliance (2.07.6(2)(k)). <br />13. The Division hereby approves the post -mining land use of the operation. It was <br />determined that rangeland and wildlife habitat meet the requirements of Rule 4.16 for the <br />permit area (2.07.6(2)(1)). <br />14. Specific approvals have been granted or are proposed. These approvals are addressed in <br />the following section, Section B (2.07.6(2)(m)). <br />15. The Division finds that the activities proposed by the applicant would not affect the <br />continued existence of endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or <br />adverse modification of their critical habitats. No additional surface disturbance is <br />planned or approved under this renewal (2.07.6(2)(n)). <br />16. The Division has contacted the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation Fees Branch. As of <br />this time, the operator is current in the payment of reclamation fees required by 30 CFR <br />Chapter VII, subchapter R (2.07.6(2)(0)). <br />New Elk Mine <br />Findings for RN -06, May 11, 2017 <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.