My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-06-09_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2017-06-09_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2020 8:55:30 AM
Creation date
6/13/2017 8:02:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/9/2017
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR89
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Technical Memorandum ■ <br /> Cripple Creek&Victor Gold Mine ■ <br /> SGVLF Stability Evaluation—Nonagglomerated Tailings <br /> NewFields Job No.475.0106.009 <br /> 1 June 2017 <br /> saturated or can soften during shaking. For the SGVLF, none of the materials are considered to <br /> be strain softening. <br /> The PGA used in the current evaluation was based on a review of publically available <br /> information regarding the seismic hazard at the site using the United States Geologic Survey <br /> (USGS) interactive deaggregations tool. The updated PGA was listed 0.11g for the 2,475-year- <br /> return seismic events, respectively. NewFields considers this an appropriate risk level for <br /> closure conditions and the current understanding of the seismic region. The output graphic <br /> from the seismic hazard analysis identifying the PGA, mean earthquake magnitude, and mean <br /> rupture distance is presented in Attachment B. <br /> The current evaluation applied a one-third reduction to the PGA for kh which we consider <br /> reasonable and conservative based on the recommendations of Hynes-Griffin and Franklin <br /> (1984). <br /> 3.2 Model Development <br /> Both static and pseudostatic loadings were evaluated for two cross-sections. The first section, <br /> Section A, extends from the top of the VLF southwest to the process solution storage area <br /> (PSSA). The second section, Section B, was chosen along the steepest slope of the VLF. Based <br /> on our understanding of the facility geometry, the slopes were modeled with the following <br /> geometric properties: <br /> A maximum heap elevation of 10,450 feet above mean sea level (amsl); <br /> Elevation at the toe of the heap at 9,450 feet amsl; <br /> Lift heights of 100 feet; <br /> Intermediate bench widths of approximately 130 feet; <br /> 5- The bench face angle was considered to be 1.4H:1V (approximate angle of repose); <br /> The overall facility slope (compound slope) was considered to be 2.5H:1V; <br /> Side slopes of the VLF are considered to be 1.6H:1V; <br /> The heap leach material is considered perfectly homogenous; <br /> The facility was modeled with a 540-foot setback from State Highway 67; and <br /> The locations of sections analyzed for the stability assessment are shown on Figure 1. <br /> Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.