Laserfiche WebLink
CONSERVATION GROUPS’ COMMENTS <br />UNCOMPAHGRE FIELD OFFICE RMP AND DEIS <br />82 <br />Total estimated emissions as well as predicted increases in emissions were <br />analyzed to develop air resource management goals, objectives, and actions that <br />would be effective in minimizing future impacts on air quality. The resulting <br />adaptive management strategy is described in detail in Appendix H (Colorado <br />BLM Comprehensive Air Resource Protection Protocol). <br /> <br />The RMP/EIS explains the relationship of monitoring and evaluation to adaptive <br />management: <br /> <br />Adaptive management. A type of natural resource management in which <br />decisions are made as part of an ongoing science-based process. Adaptive <br />management involves testing, monitoring, and evaluating applied strategies, and <br />incorporating new knowledge into management approaches that are based on <br />scientific findings and the needs of society. Results are used to modify <br />management policy, strategies, and practices. <br /> <br />The UFO seems to ignore the fact that methane emissions and waste are not monitored in <br />the same manner and to the same degree as criteria and hazardous air pollutants. According to <br />the EPA, reporting is only required of: <br /> <br />… sources that in general emit 25,000 metric tons or more of carbon dioxide <br />equivalent per year in the United States. Smaller sources … are not included in <br />the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program.236 <br /> <br /> EPA has identified many small sources that are encompassed by the RMP/EIS but that <br />would not exceed the reporting threshold and would, in the absence of additional monitoring and <br />reporting requirements established in the RMP/EIS, go unmeasured. These include: venting from <br />workovers, pneumatic devices, liquids unloading, and small compressors, and equipment leaks <br />throughout natural gas systems.237 <br /> <br />Therefore, by its own admission, UFO’s reliance on adaptive management to address <br />methane emissions and waste are “not possible” because the agency has failed to require <br />monitoring of smaller—but cumulatively significant—sources of such waste in the oil and gas <br />production process. The UFO must do more than cite the CARPP as a tool for future adaptive <br />management. Rather, the agency must adopt the methane mitigation technologies, BMPs and <br />planning tools identified above to address all future development authorized under the RMP/EIS, <br />and to apply these tools, practices, and technologies not just to development on new leases but as <br />RMP authorized stipulations on all new oil and gas development in the planning area. <br /> 236 EPA, Fact Sheet: Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Implementation, available at: <br />https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-09/documents/ghgrp-overview-factsheet.pdf <br />(attached as Exhibit 127). 237 EPA, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (Feb. 2013), available at: <br />http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/documents/pdf/infosheets/OnshorePetroleumNaturalGasSyste <br />ms.pdf (attached as Exhibit 128). <br />