My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-05-25_REVISION - C1996083
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2017-05-25_REVISION - C1996083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2017 6:58:38 AM
Creation date
5/26/2017 8:37:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/25/2017
Doc Name Note
(Citizen Concerns)
Doc Name
Comment
From
Andrew Forkes-Gudmundson
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR112
Email Name
CCW
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONSERVATION GROUPS’ COMMENTS <br />UNCOMPAHGRE FIELD OFFICE RMP AND DEIS <br />76 <br />analysis of GHG mitigation measures applicable to the Uncompahgre RMP. In particular, Table <br />V-I identifies Best Management Practices and Air Emission Reduction Strategies for Oil and Gas <br />Development, which displays some emission reduction measures, their potential environmental <br />benefits and liabilities, and feasibility. These methane measures are applicable to all new oil and <br />gas development and are not dependent on conditions in leasing areas or site-specific conditions <br />for individual APDs or MDPs, so they may and should be identified and required at the RMP <br />stage. <br /> <br /> The RMP/EIS, at 4-28, identifies several mitigation measures that are “assumed” to apply <br />to all alternatives and that would address methane emissions and waste: <br /> <br />While the levels of oil and gas development differ by alternative, emissions <br />controls were assumed to be the same for all alternatives, as follows: <br /> <br />• Drill rig and completion engines that meet or exceed Tier II engine <br />emission standards as defined in 40 CFR Part 89 <br /> <br />• Fugitive dust control from pad, road, and pipeline construction using <br />frequent watering and speed control with an assumed control efficiency of <br />50 percent <br /> <br />• Control of waste gas from well stimulation and completion assuming 90 <br />percent capture of all vented emissions, then 50 percent sent to flare and <br />50 percent sent to “green completion” <br /> <br />• 100 percent of drilling/completion fluids are delivered and disposed of by <br />truck <br /> <br />• 88 percent well pad tank emissions are captured and flared at conventional <br />gas wells; no well pad tank control is assumed for coalbed natural gas <br />wells <br /> <br />• 100 percent disposal of produced water and condensate is by truck <br /> <br />Measures identified in the CARPP (Appendix H) target sources of methane emissions <br />that contribute significant amounts of waste from natural gas production, processing and <br />transmission, and include pneumatic devices, compressors, liquids unloading, pipeline <br />maintenance and repair, and equipment leaks. Measures to control emissions and waste from <br />these sources include: <br /> <br />• Reducing the pace of development or phasing development to ensure that <br />methane can be used in the field or that gathering, boosting and processing <br />infrastructure is in place to get gas produced to a sales line; <br /> <br />• Requiring natural gas-fired drill rig engines; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.