My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-05-08_REPORT - C1982056 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2017-05-08_REPORT - C1982056 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2017 7:33:43 AM
Creation date
5/8/2017 12:39:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/8/2017
Doc Name
Annual Hydrology Report
From
Twentymile Coal Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2016
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
TNL
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the confluence with Middle Creek. Former site 304 was located further downstream of 900. Site 304 was <br />� I <br />eliminated in 2001 <br />per TR03-42. <br />II <br />Tables 33 through 36 provide summaries of the 2016 Walter Year data collected at each site. Tables 33a, 34a, and <br />35a provide POR statistical summaries of collected data at each site. Figures 52 to 59 and 102 to 105 provide <br />graphical representations of water levels and selected water quality parameters recorded at each site. Typical <br />flow patterns were exhibited at these sites with spring runoff periods accounting for the peak flows observed. At <br />all of these sites, the inverse relationship between flow and field conductivity continues to be evident. Water <br />quality parameters for these sites were within previously established ranges. A slight increase in conductivity at <br />site 8 has been noted over the last two years. This is attributed to increased discharge from Pond D, resulting <br />from overflows from the Area # 1 Pit (via DRMS site 7), which is partially fed by mine water as part of mine <br />dewatering operations for the old WMD and EMD. TC has been considering alternate treatment options for 10 <br />RT (EMD) mine water. A revision may be submitted in 2017 regarding this. <br />Fish Creek: Nine surface flow monitoring sites are utilized on Fish Creek. Site 16A replaced site 16 in 2000, <br />and is located upstream of the Fish Creek Borehole discharge site 115. Historical data for site 16 may be found in <br />previous AHRs. Site 307 is located approximately one mile downstream of the Fish Creek Borehole mine <br />dewatering site and is monitored in conjunction with alluvial well 006-A7--3. Site 302 is located approximately <br />two miles downstream of the Fish Creek Borehole mine dewatering site. Site 305 is located upstream of the Fish <br />Creek Tipple and is monitored in conjunction with alluvial well 008 -AU -3. Site 27A is located immediately <br />upstream of the Fish Creek Tipple discharge (a.k.a. CDPS discharge site 62). Site 1003 is located downstream of <br />the Fish Creek Tipple site 62. <br />Monitoring requirements at sites 307 and 305 require monthly water level measurements (March through <br />September), and semi-annual field parameters. However, per PR03-06, site 305 now requires semi-annual water <br />quality testing. <br />Three relatively new surface sites were added in conjunction with the new Fish Creek Alluvium well sites (AVF- <br />13, AV -14, and AVF-15), in order to evaluate potential subsidence impacts in the area. These are surface sites <br />SW -13, SW -14 (both added in ugust 2001), and SW -15 (added in June 2002). These sites require quarterly <br />water 1, -.vel measurements (March through September), and semi-annual field parameters and water quality <br />sampling. <br />Tables 37 through 45 provide summaries of the 2016 Water Year data collected at Fish Creek surface flow sites. <br />Tables 37a through 45a provide some historical summaries of collected data at each site for comparison. Figures <br />60 through 91 provide graphical representations of water levels and selected water quality parameters recorded at <br />each site. Again, ypical flow patterns were exhibited at these sites with spring run ff periods accounting for the <br />peak flows obsen ed. In general, an inverse relationshipetween flow and field conductivity was evident. 2006 <br />water quality parameters for these sites were generally wi in previously established. ranges. <br />Fish Creek almost went dry briefly in late August 2016. Some surface sites (e.g. 1003) saw unusual short term <br />spikes in conductivity and TDS in 2013. Some of this may be related to heavy precipitation and erosion. 2016 <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.