My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-04-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2017-04-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2020 1:16:42 AM
Creation date
4/14/2017 8:30:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
4/14/2017
Doc Name Note
Wildlife Protection - Conditional Approval Item #40
Doc Name
Wildlife Protection - Conditional Approval Item #40
From
Newmont / CC&V
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
40e. Exhibit H—Wildlife Information <br /> • Any modifications of the current fencing requirements to address Colorado Parks and <br /> Wildlife concerns <br /> CC&Vs response: <br /> Considering both operational and closure scenarios, CC&V has evaluated multiple fencing <br /> designs. This evaluation determined that whilst many designs could achieve multiple objectives, <br /> some designs are more effective than others. As an example 8 foot wire mesh fence may provide <br /> greater protection to wildlife access, however is far less effective at preventing public access. <br /> CC&V also considered the practicalities of multiple and/or varying fence designs and <br /> applications and determined that this was not a viable option. <br /> As a result, CC&V have determined that the 6 foot high chain link fence is the most functional <br /> and effective design to address the purposes of both operational security and public access, <br /> whilst deterring wildlife from encroaching open pit high walls. <br /> This design remains consistent with that currently proposed within CC&V closure planning <br /> documents. <br /> 40f. Exhibit H—Wildlife Information <br /> • Adjustments to the financial warranty associated with any changes to the wildlife <br /> protection plan including, but not limited to, installation, maintenance, and removal of <br /> wildlife protection measures. <br /> CC&V's response: Based on CC&V's determination that no changes are required to the current <br /> fencing design, no changes are required to the approved financial warranty. <br /> Summary <br /> This letter is intended to start the dialogue required between CC&V, DRMS, and CPW to reach <br /> an agreement regarding wildlife fencing within the 120 day timeframe. <br /> In summary, CC&V considers that the lack of data related to wildlife interactions with open pit high walls <br /> demonstrates the risk to the CC&V operations is negligible and well managed. <br /> Considering this demonstration,coupled with the reasonable likelihood for further mine growth and/or <br /> expansions, CC&V believe that no change to the current management approach is required. In the future, <br /> if data becomes available that indicate an issue has developed,the management approach will be <br /> revisited. <br /> Should you require further information please do not hesitate to contact Erik Munroe at 719-689- <br /> 4156 or myself at(719) 689-4055 or Meg.Burt a,newmont.com. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> ckuv L) <br /> Meg Burt <br /> Senior Environmental Manager <br /> Cripple Creek&Victor Gold Mining Co <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.