My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-04-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2017-04-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2017 10:14:52 AM
Creation date
4/10/2017 10:12:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/5/2017
Doc Name Note
Includes Reclamation Cost Estimate
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
Seneca Property LLC
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
JDM
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
upstream from the 006 Gulch confluence. This field is a small part of a much <br />larger ranching operation. Hay production from this field contributes <br />approximately 6 percent of the total ranching operations production. Mining in <br />the Seneca II -W South Extension Area is projected to increase the salinity levels <br />in Hubberson Gulch. TDS concentration of the irrigation water used on this <br />field is estimated to be 1787 mg/l which equates to a specific conductance of <br />approximately 2.4 millimhos/cm. In Tab 17, SP presents an estimate of <br />potential crop reductions based on the increased salinity level of irrigation water <br />in Hubberson Gulch. SP projects an estimated annual yield reduction of <br />approximately 4.5 tons from the subject AVF fields, which corresponds to 0.6% <br />of the total annual hay production for the ranching operation. This is considered <br />to be a negligible impact pursuant to the Division's 1998 material damage <br />guidance document. <br />b. Due to the extremely limited acreage of proposed disturbance within the Sage <br />Creek watershed, and the fact that regional ground water flow is to the west, the <br />potential for material damage to the quality or quantity of water supplied to the <br />AVF is negligible. No measurable impacts to the quantity or quality of water <br />supplying the Sage Creek AVF are projected. <br />c. Background salinity levels in the lower segment of Dry Creek from the Yampa <br />River upstream to Section 28, Township 6 North, Range 88 West are high <br />enough that no degradation of water quality is anticipated due to mining. <br />Agricultural areas potentially impacted by increased salinity levels are flood <br />irrigated grass and alfalfa haylands in Section 28, T6N, R88W. <br />With respect to the flood irrigated fields in Section 28, the application indicates <br />and includes detailed mapping and aerial photographs which show that the <br />subject fields are irrigated by water from J.C. Temple Reservoir #1, not from <br />Dry Creek. Thus, water supplying the irrigated fields would not be affected by <br />the mining operation. <br />There is no projected diminution of water quantity supplied to the Dry Creek <br />AVF. <br />3. Surface coal mining and reclamation operations have been and will be conducted to <br />preserve the essential hydrologic functions of alluvial valley floors outside the permit <br />area and to reestablish the essential hydrologic functions of alluvial valley floors <br />within the affected area throughout the mining and reclamation process (4.24.2). <br />An environmental monitoring system as described in Tab 15 of the permit <br />application has been installed, maintained, and operated by the permittee on all <br />alluvial valley floors during surface coal mining and reclamation operations and will <br />continue until all bonds are released in accordance with Rule 3 (4.24.4). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.