My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-04-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2017-04-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2017 10:14:52 AM
Creation date
4/10/2017 10:12:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/5/2017
Doc Name Note
Includes Reclamation Cost Estimate
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
Seneca Property LLC
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
JDM
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cover. The regraded areas were sampled during reclamation as required, and all of <br />the samples indicated no mitigation would be required. <br />Nitrate -nitrogen levels were excessive in 14% of the overburden core samples taken <br />at the Seneca II -W Mine. The locations of the holes which exhibited elevated levels <br />were distant from one another. Furthermore, the stratigraphic locations of the <br />elevated nitrate -nitrogen samples are not correlative. Due to the vertical and <br />horizontal distances between locations containing elevated nitrate -nitrogen levels, <br />percolating ground water will not be adversely affected. The dilutional effects of a <br />predicted spoils aquifer should buffer the concentration of nitrate as nitrogen by the <br />time the aquifer discharges to the surface system. <br />Wolf Creek/Sage Creek Overburden/Underburden Assessment <br />Only two parameters (iron and lead) exhibited unsuitable levels within sampled <br />increments from the one bore hole that penetrated the sequence in the south extension <br />area. Within each of four delineated intervals (Sage Creek overburden, Upper Wolf <br />Creek overburden, Lower Wolf Creek overburden, and Wolf Creek underburden), <br />composite samples were taken from each 10 foot depth increment. The average value <br />for lead within the Lower Wolf Creek overburden interval was in the unsuitable <br />range, due to a very high value within one of five sampled increments. One or more <br />sample increments within the Sage Creek and Wolf Creek overburden intervals <br />exhibited unsuitable iron levels, but the average iron level within each interval was <br />suitable. One of six sampled increments in the Upper Wolf Creek overburden was <br />in the unsuitable range for lead, but the average value for the interval was marginally <br />suitable. Concern relative to elevated levels of the two metals are minimized due to <br />the neutral to slightly basic pH range indicated within each sampled increment, and <br />the resulting low solubility of the metals. <br />Sampling of the Wadge underburden/Sage Creek overburden at the adjacent Yoast <br />Mine permit area identified no unsuitable parameter levels; however, a concern was <br />identified regarding potential acidity in the Wolf Creek overburden, particularly in a <br />zone 20 to 35 feet above the coal seam. Specifically, narrative in Tab 21 of the Yoast <br />Mine permit application states: <br />Excessive ABP (Acid -Base Potential) levels were identified in 28.9 percent of <br />the Wolf Creek overburden at Site 2313E, mostly in the 20 to 35 foot zone above <br />the coal seam. Typical overburden handling will effectively bury much of this <br />strata in the central portion of the spoil profile. However, based upon previous <br />information from the adjacent Seneca II Mine, acid mine spoil may occasionally <br />be identified at the surface off nal graded spoil. These areas, identified by the <br />regraded spoil monitoring program, will be buried with a minimum of three feet <br />of suitable spoil prior to soil replacement. <br />Narrative on page 39, Tab 6 states, based on the sampling results described and the <br />proposed sequence of mining and reclamation operations, that unsuitable surface <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.