My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-04-05_REVISION - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2017-04-05_REVISION - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2017 10:14:52 AM
Creation date
4/10/2017 9:18:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/5/2017
Doc Name Note
Includes Reclamation Cost Estimate
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
Seneca Property LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
RN6
Email Name
JDM
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
770 feet of artesian head in a well. It should be noted that the amount of head is <br />areally variable as the aquifer conditions change from water table (unconfined) near <br />outcrops to confined conditions at depth. <br />Due to mining methods and the thickness and type of interburden between the Wolf <br />Creek and Wadge, pit inflows from upward movement of the Wolf Creek are not <br />expected. If fracturing of the interburden and/or the Wolf Creek coal, due to blasting <br />or unloading of materials (overburden and Wadge coal seam), were to occur, it is <br />estimated that 80% of the Wolf Creek head would be lost to friction, leaving a <br />maximum total head of about 155 feet, which could potentially result in minor <br />inflow. <br />The aquifer characteristics of the Wolf Creek (low transmissivity and storativity <br />values) indicate that very little water is available for upward movement. Due to the <br />distance between the Wadge and Wolf Creek, fracturing of the Wolf Creek due to <br />mining is improbable. Inflow from the Wolf Creek coal seam into the open or <br />reclaimed pits is not expected to occur. <br />The Wadge coal and its overburden, which may locally contain the Lennox coal <br />seam, generally stores and transmits water. During mining, water flowed into active <br />and reclaimed pits. This water flowed mainly from the Wadge coal, but also from <br />the overburden. The operator estimated the following values for aquifer <br />characteristics in the Wadge Coal and Wadge Overburden: <br />* Hydraulic conductivity of overburden = .01 ft./day <br />* Hydraulic conductivity of coal = 0.02 ft./day (north pit), .01 ft. day (south pit) <br />* Storativity = 10-2 for both aquifers <br />* Transmissivity = 4.5 ft. 2/day for overburden <br />* Transmissivity = 0.12 ft. 2/day for coal <br />* Hydraulic gradient of overburden = .165 (north pit), .085 (south pit) <br />* Hydraulic gradient of coal = .15 (north pit), .11 (south pit) <br />The preceding estimated values for hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity are <br />somewhat lower than most values reported for these aquifers by mines in the area. <br />Tables 5 and 6 in Robson and Stewart's (1990) report indicates ranges in hydraulic <br />conductivity from 0.1 to 0.6 ft./day for the overburden aquifer and two values of .02 <br />and .4 ft./day for the Wadge Coal. <br />The Division's PHC findings are based on the possibility of greater inflows than <br />those predicted by the applicant. The Williams Fork Formation overburden, which <br />locally contains the Lennox Coal Seam, may contain perched aquifers. It may also <br />act as a limited aquifer system near the Wadge coal. The overburden does not <br />contain or transport significant amounts of water in this area. <br />The applicant states that no hydrologic effects due to mining will be noticed at <br />Temple Well No. 1 (a domestic water right), located south and west of the mine site. <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.