Laserfiche WebLink
mix plants were removed in the Conditional Use Permit approved by Mesa <br />therefore, those plants are no longer part of the Application. <br />CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br />12, The Board has jorlsdfction over this matter pursuant to the <br />13. Under section 34-32.5-115(4), C.RS., "the applicant must <br />requirements of this article and section 24-4-105(7), C.R.S." <br />14. Under Ride 1.4.1(10), the Appficant "has the burden of df <br />the. application mats the minimum requirements of the Act, Rules, and <br />15. UnderRule 2.8.1(1) and section 24-4105{7), CKS, "the pro, <br />order shall have the burden of proof" As the party Initiating this matter b3 <br />Application, Applicant was the "proponent of an order" at the hearing and, <br />the burden to prove that the Application is consistent with applicable laws <br />should be approved by the Board <br />16. Reclamation plans for mining sites must, among other thin. <br />account the safety and protection of wildlife on the mine site. Rate 31.8 <br />consideration of the Application, information from Applicant, and other i <br />presented at the hearing, the proposed operation takes into account the <br />protection of wildlife on the mine site. Applicant is in compliance with A <br />6.42. <br />17. Under the Act, the Division and the'Board shall grant a <br />who complies with section 34-32.5-115(4), C.R.S. The Ajoication ca <br />3432.5-115(4), C.R.S. <br />ORDER <br />Based on tate foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the <br />GRANTS the Application. <br />DONE AND ORDERED this S day of 2017. <br />FORTHE COLORADO MINED <br />RECLAMATION BOARD <br />Thomas Brubaker, Chair <br />Parkerson Construction, Inc <br />C Road Pit/ M-2016.050 <br />and, <br />with the <br />that <br />" <br />onent of an <br />filing the <br />herefore, has <br />end rules, and <br />take into <br />I 6x4.iL In <br />y and <br />3.1.8 and <br />to an applicant <br />with section <br />hereby <br />3 <br />