My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-03-29_REPORT - C1982056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2017-03-29_REPORT - C1982056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2017 11:25:57 AM
Creation date
4/5/2017 6:30:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/29/2017
Doc Name
Quarterly Subsidence Monitoring Report
From
Twentymile Coal, LLC
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Subsidence Report
Email Name
TNL
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 4: CRSP3 Parameter Ranges for Representative Site Conditions <br />SITE CONDITION <br />Tan ential Coefficient Restitution Coefficient <br />Min <br />Ave Max Min <br />Ave <br />Max <br />Sandstone Cliff Face <br />0.83 <br />0.85 0.87 0.33 <br />0.35 <br />0.37 <br />Road Pavement <br />0.83 <br />0.85 0.87 0.33 <br />0.35 <br />0.37 <br />Tallus Covered Upper Foreslo e <br />0.82 <br />0.835 0.85 0.30 <br />0.315 <br />0.33 <br />Thin Colluvium Overlying Marine <br />Shales on Upper Foreslo e <br />0.80 <br />0.835 0.85 0.30 <br />0.315 <br />0.33 <br />Colluvium Covered Lower Foreslo e <br />0.78 <br />0.805 0.83 0.28 <br />0.29 <br />1 0.30 <br />5. DAMAGE TO THE CLIFF IN THE PHASE I <br />STUDY AREA <br />The western limit of the Phase I study area, Zones 1 <br />to 3 experienced cracking, however, no massive <br />failures were observed during or following under- <br />mining. Cliff failure occurred several months after <br />undermining in Phase I Zones 4 and 5. Approxi- <br />mately twenty boulders were retained by the <br />remedial trench in Phase I, Zones 4 and 5. Table 5 <br />provides summary data for thirteen of the largest <br />blocks. Retained boulder size ranged from 10 to 900 <br />tons with an average block weight of 115 tons (1,500 <br />cubic feet). The average boulder weight was 50 tons <br />(600 cubic feet) when the largest boulder was <br />removed from consideration. <br />Table 5: Boulders Retained by the Remedial Trench/Berm <br />Boulder <br />Number <br />Type <br />Length <br />Width <br />Height <br />Approx. <br />Volume <br />(ft3) <br />Approx. <br />Mass <br />(tons) <br />R1 <br />triangle (3) <br />34 <br />26 <br />20 <br />12580 <br />944 <br />R2 <br />disk (2) <br />8 <br />5 <br />4 <br />160 <br />12 <br />R3 <br />cube (1) <br />13 <br />15 <br />12 <br />2340 <br />176 <br />R4 <br />cube (1) <br />11 <br />8 <br />7 <br />616 <br />46 <br />R5 <br />disk (2) <br />6 <br />9 <br />9 <br />486 <br />36 <br />R6 <br />disk (2) <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />60 <br />5 <br />R7 <br />disk (2) <br />5 <br />8 <br />7 <br />280 <br />21 <br />R8 <br />cube (1) <br />6 <br />6 <br />6 <br />216 <br />16 <br />R9 <br />cube 1) <br />12 <br />16 <br />11 <br />2112 <br />158 <br />R10 <br />triangle (3) <br />4 <br />7 <br />4.5 <br />126 <br />9 <br />R11 <br />disk (2) <br />9 <br />9 <br />6 <br />486 <br />36 <br />R12 <br />disk (2) <br />8 <br />10 <br />5 <br />400 <br />30 <br />R13 <br />cube (1) <br />2 <br />2 <br />2 <br />8 <br />1 <br />Average <br />9 <br />10 <br />8 <br />1528 <br />115 <br />Average without 944 ton block <br />7 <br />8 <br />1 7 <br />608 <br />46 <br />6. REFERENCES <br />CTI, 1993. Colorado Rockfall Simulation Program <br />(CRSP), Users Manual for Version 3.0, <br />Colorado Transportation Institute, December <br />1993. <br />Pfeiffer, T.J. and Bowen, T.D. "Computer <br />Simulation of Rockfalls", Bull. Of Assoc. of <br />Engineering Geologists, Vol. 26 1989. <br />Priest, S.D. and Hudson, J. A. "Discontinuity <br />Spacing in Rock", Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. <br />Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. Vol. 13,1976. <br />Priest, S.D. and Hudson, J. A. "Estimation of <br />Discontinuity Spacing and Trace Length <br />Using Scanline Surveys", Int. J. Rock Mech. <br />Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. Vol. 18,1981. <br />SubTerra, Inc., 1994. Rockfall Hazard Assessment <br />and Selection of Hazard Control or <br />Mitigation Measures, report prepared for <br />Twentymile Coal Company, October, 7, <br />1994. <br />TerzaghiI R. D. "Sources of Error In Joint Surveys" <br />Geotechnique, Vol. 15,1965. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.