My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-03-22_HYDROLOGY - M2001005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2001005
>
2017-03-22_HYDROLOGY - M2001005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2017 2:02:03 PM
Creation date
3/24/2017 1:45:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001005
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
3/22/2017
Doc Name
Substitute Water Supply Plan
From
DNR Water Resources
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Paul Bruss March 22, 2017 <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br />after reclamation, replacement of lagged depletions from mining and dewatering shall <br />continue until there is no longer an effect on stream flow. Any subsequent request for a <br />renewal/additional SWSP for this site must include information regarding the estimated <br />date mining will be completed and the Applicant’s plans for filing an application with the <br />water court for a plan for augmentation. <br /> <br />12. In accordance with the letter dated April 30, 2010 from the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (“DRMS”), all sand and gravel mining operators must <br />comply with the requirements of the Colorado Reclamation Act and the Mineral Rules <br />and Regulations for the protection of water resources. The April 30, 2010 letter from <br />DRMS requires that you provide information to DRMS to demonstrate you can replace <br />long term injurious stream depletions that result from mining related exposure of <br />ground water. The DRMS letter identifies four approaches to satisfy this requirement. <br /> <br />In accordance with approach nos. 1 and 3, a bond for $115,000 has been obtained through <br />DRMS. It is our understanding that this may be used for backfilling of the sediment pond and <br />water basin, but is not adequate for backfilling of the Phase 2 mining pit. Therefore, in <br />accordance with approach no. 4, you have indicated that the mineral lease between the <br />Applicant and the landowner provides for the Applicant’s use of the Lester-Attebery water <br />rights in connection with the mining operation. You have indicated that the Applicant <br />intends to fully utilize the Lester-Attebery Ditch rights as the sole replacement supply for a <br />long-term augmentation plan for the Grisenti Pit. For the purposes of this SWSP, the lease <br />agreement will be accepted for the dedication of the subject water rights; however, if the <br />State Engineer determines that a different dedication process is necessary to assure proper <br />dedication of water rights, additional information, may be required prior to future SWSP <br />approvals. <br /> <br />13. The replacement water that is the subject of this SWSP cannot be sold, leased or otherwise <br />legally encumbered during the term of this SWSP. As a condition of subsequent renewals of <br />this SWSP, the replacement water must be appurtenant to this site until a plan for <br />augmentation is obtained. All replacement water must be concurrent with depletions in <br />quantity, timing, and location. <br /> <br />14. The State Engineer may revoke this SWSP or add additional restrictions to its operation if at <br />any time the State Engineer determines that injury to other vested water rights has or will <br />occur as a result of this SWSP. Should this SWSP expire without renewal or be revoked prior <br />to adjudication of a permanent plan for augmentation, all use of ground water must cease <br />immediately. <br /> <br />15. In accordance with amendments to C.R.S. § 25-8-202(7) and "Senate Bill 89-181 Rules and <br />Regulations" adopted on February 4, 1992, the state engineer shall determine whether or <br />not the substitute supply is of a quality to meet requirements of use to senior appropriators. <br />As such, water quality data or analysis may be requested at any time to determine if the <br />water quality is appropriate for downstream water users. <br /> <br />16. The decision of the State Engineer shall have no precedential or evidentiary force, shall not <br />create any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a defense in any water court <br />case or any other legal action that may be initiated concerning the SWSP. This decision shall <br />not bind the State Engineer to act in a similar manner in any other applications involving <br />other plans or in any proposed renewal of this plan, and shall not imply concurrence with
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.