Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Paul Bruss March 22, 2017 <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br />after reclamation, replacement of lagged depletions from mining and dewatering shall <br />continue until there is no longer an effect on stream flow. Any subsequent request for a <br />renewal/additional SWSP for this site must include information regarding the estimated <br />date mining will be completed and the Applicant’s plans for filing an application with the <br />water court for a plan for augmentation. <br /> <br />12. In accordance with the letter dated April 30, 2010 from the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (“DRMS”), all sand and gravel mining operators must <br />comply with the requirements of the Colorado Reclamation Act and the Mineral Rules <br />and Regulations for the protection of water resources. The April 30, 2010 letter from <br />DRMS requires that you provide information to DRMS to demonstrate you can replace <br />long term injurious stream depletions that result from mining related exposure of <br />ground water. The DRMS letter identifies four approaches to satisfy this requirement. <br /> <br />In accordance with approach nos. 1 and 3, a bond for $115,000 has been obtained through <br />DRMS. It is our understanding that this may be used for backfilling of the sediment pond and <br />water basin, but is not adequate for backfilling of the Phase 2 mining pit. Therefore, in <br />accordance with approach no. 4, you have indicated that the mineral lease between the <br />Applicant and the landowner provides for the Applicant’s use of the Lester-Attebery water <br />rights in connection with the mining operation. You have indicated that the Applicant <br />intends to fully utilize the Lester-Attebery Ditch rights as the sole replacement supply for a <br />long-term augmentation plan for the Grisenti Pit. For the purposes of this SWSP, the lease <br />agreement will be accepted for the dedication of the subject water rights; however, if the <br />State Engineer determines that a different dedication process is necessary to assure proper <br />dedication of water rights, additional information, may be required prior to future SWSP <br />approvals. <br /> <br />13. The replacement water that is the subject of this SWSP cannot be sold, leased or otherwise <br />legally encumbered during the term of this SWSP. As a condition of subsequent renewals of <br />this SWSP, the replacement water must be appurtenant to this site until a plan for <br />augmentation is obtained. All replacement water must be concurrent with depletions in <br />quantity, timing, and location. <br /> <br />14. The State Engineer may revoke this SWSP or add additional restrictions to its operation if at <br />any time the State Engineer determines that injury to other vested water rights has or will <br />occur as a result of this SWSP. Should this SWSP expire without renewal or be revoked prior <br />to adjudication of a permanent plan for augmentation, all use of ground water must cease <br />immediately. <br /> <br />15. In accordance with amendments to C.R.S. § 25-8-202(7) and "Senate Bill 89-181 Rules and <br />Regulations" adopted on February 4, 1992, the state engineer shall determine whether or <br />not the substitute supply is of a quality to meet requirements of use to senior appropriators. <br />As such, water quality data or analysis may be requested at any time to determine if the <br />water quality is appropriate for downstream water users. <br /> <br />16. The decision of the State Engineer shall have no precedential or evidentiary force, shall not <br />create any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a defense in any water court <br />case or any other legal action that may be initiated concerning the SWSP. This decision shall <br />not bind the State Engineer to act in a similar manner in any other applications involving <br />other plans or in any proposed renewal of this plan, and shall not imply concurrence with