My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-03-16_REPORT - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2017-03-16_REPORT - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2017 8:17:51 AM
Creation date
3/17/2017 7:34:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/16/2017
Doc Name
Annual Hydrology Report Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company, LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
RDZ
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2014 AHR <br />Sampling Locations <br />The required water monitoring locations for the New Elk Mine are in the PAP, including the text of <br />Section 2.05 and Table 27. The 2014 AHR includes data for all of these sites except: <br />• PRS -la and PRS -4a <br />• PAWla <br />• NM -23. <br />Please explain the lack of data for these sites. If they are temporarily or permanently inactive, please <br />explain this in response to this letter and include a discussion in future AHRs. Also, please consider <br />they should be removed from the monitoring plan in the PAP with a revision. <br />The NPDES data is included by reference in the AHR. Actual data can be found in quarterly Discharge <br />Monitoring Reports. This procedure is in compliance with the rules and the permit. <br />Monitoring Frequency <br />It appears that there is insufficient data in the 2014 AHR to determine when sampling of groundwater (not <br />including alluvial wells) occurred. The only information for these groundwater sites is in the form of an <br />annual summary table, however the monitoring plan requires more than one sample per year for some of <br />these sites (e.g., NE -1-10 should be sampled quarterly). In future AHRs, please provide the original <br />data field notes and lab reports) for all monitoring locations, including locations in the mine workings <br />and bedrock wells. <br />List of Water Quality Parameters <br />Please explain the lack of water quality data for Wells NEW -2, NEW -3, and NEW -4 in 2014. <br />Analysis of Surface Water Data <br />Regarding water quantity, the data do not provide evidence that the hydrologic impacts of mining have <br />been more deleterious than the impacts predicted in the Permit Application Package (PAP). <br />Review of New Elk Mine AHRs <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.