My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-03-15_REPORT - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2017-03-15_REPORT - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2017 7:39:06 AM
Creation date
3/16/2017 7:31:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/15/2017
Doc Name
Annual Hydrology Report
From
Trapper Mining Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2016
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
RAR
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
926
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Water levels in well GP -9 have been overall steady the last few years. This water -level <br />change is likely natural in this well. <br />Figure A-4 presents water levels for wells GF -7 and P-8. These wells are completed in <br />the HI backfill and 3rd White Sandstone aquifers, respectively. Water levels in well GF -7 (see <br />Figure A-4) were steady in the last two years. The larger storage value in the unconfined backfill <br />aquifer may dampen the effects of dry and wet years. The recovery from the A pit mining in this <br />area may be nearly completed. The water levels in well P-8 declined in 2012 and since have been <br />overall steady. <br />Water levels for well GF -4 are presented in Figure A-5. A large rise in water level in well <br />GF -4 was observed in the last half of 1999 after the repair of the casing on September 29, 1999. <br />Water levels overall were fairly similar the last few years in well GF -4. Mining occurred south of <br />well GF -4 in the early 1980's and is expected to limit water -level changes in the HI aquifer near well <br />GF -4. Water levels in the upgradient unconfined backfill aquifer do not fluctuate as much as the <br />confined HI aquifer. The backfill aquifer may prevent the low recharge year from affecting the <br />water level down gradient in the HI aquifer. It is also possible that the backfill spring in Johnson <br />Gulch may be limiting the head in the backfill aquifer. <br />Wells GF -6 and GF -11 are completed in the QR aquifer and QR backfill, respectively. <br />Backfill well GF -11 is located on the downgradient side of the inactive E pit, while well GF -6 is <br />located downgradient of the pit. GF -11 is 1150 feet upslope and upgradient of GF -6. Overall <br />increases in water levels were observed in wells GF -6 and GF -11 for 2008 with similar but smaller <br />seasonal changes observed in 2009 and 2010 (see Figure A-6). Large seasonal changes were <br />observed in 2011 with overall higher water levels. Water levels in the backfill well overall declined <br />in 2012 through 2015 with a small overall rise in 2016 while the levels were steady down gradient in <br />Trapper Mining Company 2-6 <br />2016 Annual Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.