My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-03-10_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2017-03-10_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2020 1:31:54 AM
Creation date
3/13/2017 9:01:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/10/2017
Doc Name
Request for Technical Revision
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR89
Email Name
TC1
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9.0 METHOD PERFORMANCE <br /> 9.1 Ruggedness. Two ruggedness studies have been performed to determine <br /> the effect of various perturbations on specific elements of the TCLP protocol . <br /> Ruggedness testing determines the sensitivity of small procedural variations <br /> which might be expected to occur during routine laboratory application. <br /> 9.1.1 Metals - The following conditions were used when leaching <br /> a waste for metals analysis: <br /> Varying Conditions <br /> Liquid/Solid ratio 19:1 vs . 21:1 <br /> Extraction time 16 hours vs. 18 hours <br /> Headspace 20% vs. 60% <br /> Buffer #2 acidity 190 meq vs . 210 meq <br /> Acid-washed filters yes vs . no <br /> Filter type 0.7 um glass fiber vs. 0.45 um <br /> vs. polycarbonate <br /> Bottle type borosilicate vs. flint glass <br /> Of the seven method variations examined, acidity of the extraction <br /> fluid had the greatest impact on the results. Four of 13 metals from an <br /> API separator sludge/electroplating waste (API/EW) mixture and two of <br /> three metals from an ammonia lime still bottom waste were extracted at <br /> higher levels by the more acidic buffer. Because of the sensitivity to pH <br /> changes , the method requires that the extraction fluids be prepared so <br /> that the final pH is within + 0.05 units as specified. <br /> 9.1.2 Volatile Organic Compounds - The following conditions were <br /> used when leaching a waste for VOC analysis: <br /> Varying Conditions <br /> Liquid/Solid ratio 19:1 vs. 21:1 <br /> Headspace 0% vs. 5% <br /> Buffer #1 acidity 60 meq vs. 80 meq <br /> Method of storing extract Syringe vs . Tedlar® bag <br /> Aliquotting yes vs. no <br /> Pressure behind piston 0 psi vs . 20 psi <br /> CD-ROM 1311- 22 Revision 0 <br /> July 1992 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.