My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-03-10_REVISION - C1981019 (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2017-03-10_REVISION - C1981019 (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2017 7:45:12 AM
Creation date
3/13/2017 7:01:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/10/2017
Doc Name
Application
From
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL12
Email Name
ZTT
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.0 METHODOLOGY FOR VEGETATION SAMPLING / COMPARISON METHODS <br />2.1 Sample Site Selection / Location <br />The sample layout protocol for revegetation evaluations in 2014 followed approved procedures set <br />forth in Permit Section 4.15. The systematic procedure for sample location in the revegetated units <br />occurred in the following stepwise manner. First, a fixed point of reference was selected for the unit to <br />facilitate location of the systematic grid in the field. Second, a systematic grid of appropriate dimensions <br />was selected to provide a reasonable number of coordinate intersections (e.g., 20) that could then be <br />used for the set of sample sites. Third, a scaled representation of the grid was overlain on a computer- <br />generated map of the target area extending along north/south and east/west lines. Fourth, the initial <br />placement of this grid was implemented by selection of two random numbers (an X and Y distance) used <br />for locating the first coordinate from the fixed point of reference, thereby making the effort unbiased. <br />Fifth, where an excess number of potential sample points (grid intersections) was indicated by overlain <br />maps, the excess points were randomly chosen for elimination. (If later determined that additional <br />samples would be needed, the eliminated potential sample sites would be added back in reverse order <br />until enough samples could be collected.) Sixth, utilizing a GPS, the sample points were located in the <br />field. <br />Once a selected grid point was located in the field, ground cover sampling transects were always <br />oriented in the direction of the next site to be physically sampled to further limit any potential bias while <br />facilitating sampling efficiency. This orientation protocol is indicated on Figure 1. If the boundary of the <br />area was encountered before reaching the full length of a transect, the orientation of the transect was <br />turned 90° in the appropriate direction so the transect could be completed. In this manner, boundary <br />transects were retained entirely within the target unit by "bouncing" off the boundaries. <br />2.2 Determination of Ground Cover <br />Ground cover at each sample point was determined utilizing the point -intercept methodology as <br />illustrated on Figure 1. A transect of 10 meters length was extended in the direction of the next sampling <br />location from the flagged center of each systematically located sample point. At each one -meter interval <br />along the transect, a laser point bar was situated parallel to, and approximately 4.5 to 5.0 feet vertically <br />above the ground surface. A set of 10 readings was taken specifically to record hits on vegetation (by <br />species), litter, standing dead, rock (>2mm), or bare soil. Hits were determined at each meter interval <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.