My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-23_REPORT - C1981020
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981020
>
2017-02-23_REPORT - C1981020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 9:33:30 AM
Creation date
2/28/2017 7:30:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981020
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/23/2017
Doc Name
Vegetation Sampling Report
From
J. E. Stover & Associates, Inc.
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2016
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Email Name
JHB
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />2.5 Sample Adequacy Determination <br />Sampling within each unit (Phase III Bond Release Block or Sagebrush Reference Area) was conducted <br />to a minimum of 30 samples. From these preliminary efforts, sample means and standard deviations for <br />total non-overlapping vegetation ground cover, production, and woody plant density were calculated. The <br />Cochran formula (below) for determining sample adequacy was used to calculate nmin, whereby the <br />population is estimated to within 10% of the true mean (µ) with 90% confidence. <br />When the inequality (nmin ≤ n) is true, sampling is deemed adequate; and nmin is determined as <br />follows: <br /> nmin = (t 2s 2) / (0.1 x )2 <br /> <br /> <br />Where: n = the number of actual samples collected <br /> t = the value from the one-tailed t distribution for 90% confidence with n-1 <br /> degrees of freedom; <br /> s 2 = the variance of the estimate as calculated from the initial samples; <br /> x = the mean of the estimate as calculated from the initial samples. <br />If the initial samples do not provide a suitable estimate of the mean (i.e., the inequality is false), a <br />reverse null success evaluation which does not require adequacy would be employed (Rule 4.15.11 (2)(c)). <br />Sample adequacy results are presented on Tables 2, 9, 10, and 11. <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, Inc.10 Munger Canyon Mine - 2016 <br />Phase III Bond Release Report
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.