Laserfiche WebLink
4 4 2 Establishment and Management of Sampling Areas <br /> In the past, Trapper Mine considered using a system of reference areas for testing success of <br /> revegetation. The reference area sampling approach has been eliminated in favor of a more <br /> appropriate technical standard reclamation success comparison approach. Thus, current <br /> management of sampling areas is concerned just with reclaimed areas. These areas are managed <br /> and protected from erosion, overgrazing, etc. as part of the Trapper Mine reclamation plan described <br /> elsewhere in this permit document. <br /> 4.4.2.1 Permanent Reference Areas <br /> Note: Section 4.4.2.1 remains in the permit document for historical reference only. Trapper's <br /> post-mining bond release sampling approach is based on technical standards, not permanent <br /> reference areas. <br /> In the early summer of 1980, three permanent reference areas per vegetation type were selected and <br /> fenced. Selection of the sites was such that the enclosure and its orientation crossed the greatest <br /> variability of the type. Site location had to be based on the availability of range site areas free of past, <br /> present or future disturbance. It must be emphasized that these sites could be used as an index and <br /> need not be randomly located. The most important criteria is that they sample the range site <br /> variability. The 24,000 scale range condition Map M17 provides the approximate position of <br /> permanent reference sites. <br /> Based on 1980 vegetation data, it is apparent that the major parameters of concern (cover, stem <br /> density and species diversity), are generally comparable (Table 4.4-16, 4.4-17, 4.4-18, 4.4-19). <br /> The reference sites were chosen such that the variability of the type (mountain shrub or big <br /> sagebrush-grass) was sampled. This appears to be the case in most instances if one compares the <br /> range of means of each parameter in the permanent reference sites with each associated range site. <br /> The exceptions being herbaceous cover in the big sagebrush-grass type (Table 4.4-15), herbaceous <br /> plant diversity in the mountain shrub type (Table 4.4-17), and shrub diversity in the mountain shrub <br /> type (Table 4.4-19 and 4.4-20). <br /> A statistical comparison of the production sample means for permanent reference sites versus <br /> premine sample sites shows that they are similar(Table 4.4-21 and 4.4-22). In the analysis, the data <br /> from the permanent reference sites were combined. This is necessary since the permanent sites, as <br /> a group, were designed to sample the variability of the vegetative type, i.e. mountain shrub or big <br /> sagebrush-grass. <br /> 4-129 <br /> Revision: <br /> Approved: <br />