My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-21_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
2017-02-21_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2017 8:15:08 AM
Creation date
2/21/2017 4:24:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/21/2017
Doc Name
Request for Technical Revision
From
Battle Mountain Resources, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR34
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.3 Hydrologic Investigations <br />The South Diversion Ditch was originally designed and approved for operational purposes to <br />bypass around the impoundment upland runoff from a 100 -year flood. Larger floods were <br />intended by design to overtop the ditch and flow into the impoundment, in which adequate <br />freeboard would be maintained to contain floods up to the PMF event without overtopping the <br />dam embankment. Engineering analyses provided in the Detailed Inspection Report (MGC, <br />2014) concluded that the hydraulic conveyance capacity of the existing Drop Structure may be <br />less than was calculated by the original design analysis. The closed -conduit design of the <br />structure makes it susceptible to clogging by debris during a large flood event. The updated <br />hydrology presented in this section and Appendix B of this report indicates that the current 100 - <br />year, 24-hour flood estimate is greater than the estimate for that event which was the original <br />basis of design. These conditions are adverse factors that increase the risk of overtopping of the <br />Drop Structure that could result in scour at the left dam abutment and possible release of tailing <br />and impounded flood waters. This was an identified and highlighted potential failure mode (see <br />Detailed Inspection Report, MGC, 2014). <br />A design objective is that the facility perform within tolerable risk guidelines for dam safety, <br />which were defined in the Detailed Inspection Report (MGC, 2014). An Inflow Design Flood <br />(IDF) has not been established for this facility, because the facility is not under the jurisdiction of <br />the Colorado Division of Water Resources (DWR). However, with the objective being to reduce <br />risk to below tolerable risk guidelines for similar facilities, BMRI has opted to upgrade the South <br />Diversion Ditch and Drop Structure to improve protection for major flood events up to a <br />Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). With this objective in mind, BMRI directed the MGC <br />engineering team to design upgrades to the South Diversion Ditch and Drop Structure with the <br />following specific hydrologic design goals: <br />1. Intercept and divert upland runoff from events on the order of a 500 -year storm, with full <br />design freeboard on the entire diversion system (ditch and drop structure), and with no <br />release of intercepted flows into the reclaimed tailing impoundment area. <br />2. Split flows from larger events such that a portion of the inflow is stored behind the dam <br />with adequate freeboard to dam crest, and the remainder of the flood is routed around the <br />dam with minimal freeboard on the diversion structures at the extreme PMF discharge. <br />The original hydrologic basis of design was updated as part of this study because of changes in <br />available hydrologic data and analyses procedures since the original design was completed, as <br />documented in the project records (BMRI, 1989). Hydrologic studies in support of the diversion <br />system upgrade design are described in a separate report prepared by DOWL (2015), which is <br />attached as Appendix B to this Design Report. The chosen Design Basis Flood (DBF) is the <br />probable maximum flood (PMF) based on the Rocky Mountain unit hydrograph with Ksat <br />infiltration assumptions. Table 2.1 summarizes the estimated peak flows from each of the three <br />sub -basins (A, B, and C) of the contributing watershed above the South Diversion Ditch. Maps <br />showing the sub -basin delineations are provided in Appendix B. Table 2.2 lists the contributing <br />flow from each sub -basin, concurrent with the total flow below Basin C. The data summarized <br />on Table 2.2 were used in HEC -RAS routing for sizing and design of the channel improvements <br />and drop structure (described in Section 3 of this report). <br />San Luis Project — South Diversion Ditch Drop Structure - Final Design Report 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.