My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-21_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
2017-02-21_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2017 8:15:08 AM
Creation date
2/21/2017 4:24:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/21/2017
Doc Name
Request for Technical Revision
From
Battle Mountain Resources, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR34
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2 Geotechnical Investigations <br />Under a subcontract with MGC, Engineering Analytics conducted subsurface investigations in <br />the area of the proposed new drop structure. The complete Geotechnical Investigation Report is <br />provided as Appendix A with this Design Report. The scope of the investigation and key <br />findings are summarized in the following sections. <br />2.2.1 Scope of Field Investigation <br />Engineering Analytics conducted a field investigation between October 13 and 15, 2015 that <br />included excavating three test pits (EA-DSTP1 through EA-DSTP3) to depths ranging from 4.5 <br />to 8.5 feet below the ground surface (bgs) and drilling of five exploratory boreholes (EA-DSB 1 <br />through EA-DSB5) to depths ranging from 34.7 to 44.8 feet bgs. The locations of the boreholes <br />and test pits are shown on Figure 2.1, relative to the footprint of the proposed structure. Boring <br />and test pit logs and photographs taken during the site investigation are presented in Appendix A. <br />2.2.2 Subsurface Conditions Observed <br />Soil conditions generally consist of silty to clayey and gravelly sand alluvial deposits from the <br />ground surface to depths ranging from 1 to 5 feet bgs. Poorly -cemented, highly weathered <br />conglomerate was encountered below the alluvium and ranged in thickness from 1.5 to 3.5 feet. <br />The weathered conglomerate was friable under hand pressure and easily excavated using a <br />Caterpillar 420F backhoe loader. More competent conglomerate was encountered immediately <br />below the weathered conglomerate. Although the conglomerate was not rippable using the <br />Caterpillar 420F used to excavate the test pits, it was poorly cemented and could be broken by <br />hand pressure using two hands. <br />Figure 2.2 shows an interpretive geologic profile on the alignment of the proposed drop <br />structure. The geologic profile depicts the current ground surface, and the interpreted interfaces <br />between soil, weathered conglomerate and conglomerate bedrock, as encountered in the test pits <br />and soil borings. The following summarizes the general site stratigraphy as interpreted by the <br />subsurface exploration. All depths are relative to the ground surface at the time of the <br />investigation. <br />SAND FILL: Sand fill with varying amounts of silt, clay, and gravel was present from <br />the ground surface to between 2 and 3 feet bgs at two boring locations. The fill material <br />consisted of reworked and relocated native materials used to construct drill pads at EA- <br />DS133 and EA-DSB5. <br />• CLAYEY TO SILTY SAND, ALLUVIUM: Native silty to clayey sand, with gravel <br />was generally encountered from at or near the ground surface to depths ranging from 4 <br />feet to 9 feet bgs at each location except EA-DSB3 and EA-DSB5. The alluvium was <br />brown to dark yellowish brown, dry to slightly moist, and medium dense to very dense. <br />WEATHERED CONGLOMERATE: Weathered conglomerate was encountered <br />below the alluvium at each soil boring location and was observed up to 14 feet bgs in the <br />soil borings. The weathered conglomerate was poorly cemented and easily friable under <br />---------------------------- -- ------------------------ <br />San Luis Project - South Diversion Ditch Drop Structure - Final Design Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.