My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-15_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2017-02-15_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2017 10:35:38 AM
Creation date
2/16/2017 10:23:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/15/2017
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
RN4
Email Name
CCW
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />A-11 <br />Common Name/ <br />Scientific Name <br />USFS <br />Status <br />BLM <br />Status <br />CPW <br />Status1 <br />Potential <br />Occurrence in <br />the Analysis <br />Area 2 Habitat3 <br />Milk snake <br />Lampropeltis <br />trianguium <br />taylori <br />N/A Sensitive N/A Possible <br />Grasslands, sandhills, canyons, open <br />woodlands ponderosa, pinyon-juniper; <br />known along the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison River. <br />Midget faded <br />rattlesnake <br />Crotalus viridis <br />concolor <br />N/A Sensitive SC Possible <br />Most terrestrial habitats in west-central <br />Colorado including grasslands, <br />shrublands, pinyon-juniper woodlands, <br />coniferous forests. <br />1 Colorado Parks and Wildlife Status Codes: SC = State Special Concern (not a statutory category) (CPW, 2013a). 2 Potential Occurrence based on habitat associations and known distributions: <br />Unlikely: May occur in Delta County and marginally suitable habitat present in the project area. <br />Likely: Occurs in Delta County, suitable habitat is present, likely to be present in the project area. <br />Possible: Occurs in Delta County, suitable habitat is present, but not observed in the project area. <br />Present: Observed in the project area and/or occupied habitat includes the project area. 3 Sources: CNHP, 2013; CPW, 2012a; Weber and Wittmann, 1987; Andrews and Righter, 1992; Hammerson, 1986; Woodling, <br />1985; Fitzgerald et al., 1994. <br /> <br />No lands within the review area are designated as Critical Habitat, proposed to be designated as <br />Critical Habitat, or determined to be essential habitat for any federally-listed Threatened or <br />Endangered plant or animal species, or species proposed for listing. However, Critical Habitat <br />for the endangered Colorado River fish does exist off-site in the Colorado River drainage which <br />potentially could be affected by water depletion from this action (USFWS, 1994). USFWS has <br />concluded that any water depletion in the upper Colorado River Basin “may affect” these <br />Endangered fish species and their Critical Habitat. <br /> <br />Current plans for mining may include the lands under the West Fork of Terror Creek. <br />Subsidence associated with the Proposed Action is expected to be minimal to negligible and <br />would generally affect the area immediately overlying those areas that are mined. Therefore, no <br />subsidence related disturbance to the flows in Terror Creek or to Threatened greenback cutthroat <br />trout are predicted as a result of proposed mining on the LBA tract. Lands are suitable for coal <br />leasing after applying the exceptions to the criteria. In order to protect the West Fork of Terror <br />Creek and related habitat for the Threatened greenback cutthroat trout, the following lease <br />stipulations would be required for the LBA tract: <br />• State-of-the-art mining techniques (pillar and panel widths, rate of coal development <br />and extraction, mine method, determining angle of draw, etc.) would be used to <br />control subsidence. No mining-related surface disturbance (i.e., MDWs and roads – <br />not including subsidence) would occur within 200 feet of greenback cutthroat trout <br />occupied habitat, as measured from the normal high water mark, without a written <br />finding from the Authorized Officer. These techniques would provide for maximum <br />coal removal while protecting the values associated with the threatened greenback <br />cutthroat trout habitat. <br />• Adequate sediment control devices, such as silt fences or straw wattles composed of <br />native substances or other effective BMPs, would be placed down slope from the pads <br />and access roads to prevent potential sedimentation effects to West Terror Creek.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.