Laserfiche WebLink
present for sandhill crane nest establishment. These surveys did not locate any active nests even at those sites that <br />were documented as active in early May. Several pairs and a few observations of bachelor groups of birds were <br />•recorded, however. A total of seven distinct pairs of cranes were observed on or near the permit area. All <br />observations of areas of suitable nesting habitat, nests, and observations of sandhill cranes were recorded and <br />plotted on field maps and then transferred to Map 21, Locations of Sandhill Crane Nests and Nesting Habitat and <br />Raptor Cliff- Nesting =Habitat. Locations of birds observed by John Monarch during his early May, 1984, survey are <br />also plotted on this map. <br />In addition to nest searches, a subjective evaluation, regarding the suitability of permit area stock ponds and <br />drainages as crane nesting habitat, was made. This evaluation was based on a review of pertinent literature and a <br />knowledge of nests sites preferred by cranes in northwest Colorado. Areas that were judged most suitable for crane <br />nesting activity are noted on Map 21, Locations of Sandhill Crane Nests and Nesting habitat and Raptor Cliff - <br />nesting Habitat. <br />The fact that no observations of individual birds were made during the June, 1984, survey would tend to indicate <br />that the pairs observed were either non - breeding pairs, or laying of eggs and incubation had not been initiated. <br />During the 1984 surveys no single birds were flushed from the drainages or from around stoc ponds, and no birds <br />were observed with young. In addition, none were observed performing a distraction display which is usually <br />indicative of an active nest nearby (Littlefield 1968, Bieniasz 1978). Blake (1974) reported that most eggs in <br />Colorado are laid from late May to early June. The incubation period for cranes is approximately 30 days (Drewien <br />1973, Blake 1974). Drewien (1973) found that cranes seldom left nests unattended once eggs were laid, and during <br />87 hours of observing 5 incubating pairs, he found that nests were unattended only 1.2 percent of the time. <br />Incubation duties are shared by both birds with the female usually incubating at night and the male during the day <br />(Blake 1974). <br />There was some evidence that the unusually late spring and extremely high runoff in mid -May may have disrupted <br />or delayed crane nesting activity in Twentymile Park. In Blake's (1975) studies on nesting cranes in northwest <br />• Colorado, nesting was delayed about two weeks as a result of late, heavy snowstorms. Unusually late spring <br />snowstorms and heavy spring runoff were documented for the general Twentymile Park region in 1984. Runoff in <br />mid -May in Twentymile Park was so high that Fish Creek overflowed its banks and washed out a portion of County <br />Road No. 27 near the southern edge of the permit area. Many of the smaller drainages in the permit area also <br />showed evidence of high water, as indicated by debris piled up in the sagebrush above the drainages. High water in <br />mid -May may explain why the nest located in early May by John Monarch could not be relocated in June. In a <br />study of nesting cranes in Oregon, Littlefield (1968) documented one case of nest desertion as a result of flooding. <br />It is uncertain whether re- nesting would occur after desertion due to flooding, but re- nesting following egg <br />destruction by predators has been documented (Littlefield 1968, Drewien 1973). <br />Three additional active: nests were located in the permit area by CDOW personnel during a helicopter survey of the <br />general area in late June, 1984. Two nests contained two eggs and one was vacant. Locations of these nests are <br />also plotted on Map 21, Locations of Sandhill Crane Nests and Nesting Habitat and Raptor Cliff- nesting Habitat. <br />Unless notified by regulatory authorities, no further surveys are planned. <br />Critical Big -Game Winter Range Overlay for Permit and Surface Disturbance Areas <br />As a component of the Wildlife Resources Information requirement, elk and mule deer critical winter range areas, <br />as depicted on CDOW Wildlife Information System Maps, were overlayed with the TCC Permit boundaries and <br />proposed areas of surface disturbance. Mule deer and elk winter range, winter concentration areas, severe winter <br />range, critical winter range, and migration routes were plotted on base maps showing the Permit boundaries and <br />proposed surface disturbances. <br />As discussed previously, mule deer winter habitat in the permit area is limited to the southeast portion. Critical <br />•winter range and concentration areas occur along the southwest and southeast facing, shrub- covered slopes near <br />Foidel Creek (Map 20, Mule Deer Biological Features). No mule deer migration routes have been identified in the <br />area. As shown on Map 20, Mule Deer Biological Features, no new surface disturbances are proposed to occur <br />within any mule deer critical winter range or concentration areas. An existing road at the eastern end of designated <br />RN08 -05 2.04 -67 03/12/10 <br />