My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-03_REVISION - C1980004 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2017-02-03_REVISION - C1980004 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2017 6:42:45 AM
Creation date
2/8/2017 12:49:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/3/2017
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
McClane Canyon Mining, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR2
Email Name
ZTT
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Greasewood Shrubland: <br />Shadscale Shrubland: <br />Juniper Woodland: <br />500 stems per acre <br />500 stems per acre <br />1,500 stems per acre <br />The Division finds that a density standard lower than 90 percent of the density of the <br />approved reference area is appropriate (4.15.8(7)). <br />XII. PROTECTION OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES <br />— RULE 4.18 <br />Fish and wildlife information and the fish and wildlife plan are presented in Section 4.3 of <br />the application. The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service (USFWS) were both notified of the RN-06/TR-15 applications, and both agencies <br />submitted comments that were forwarded to the operator and addressed via the review <br />process, in 2006. The Wildlife Plan in Section 4.3.7 of the application was amended to <br />document that all mine powerlines had been constructed in compliance with Rule 4.18(4) <br />to minimize electrocution hazard to raptors (see Permit Appendix Q letter from Grand <br />Valley Power). A draft biological assessment providing an updated and comprehensive <br />assessment of the potential impacts of the operation on threatened, endangered, and <br />candidate species was included in the permit as Table 4.3.9. Necessary Biological <br />Assessment and Biological Opinion documents demonstrating compliance with applicable <br />provisions of the Federal Endangered Species Act were prepared by OSM and USFWS, <br />respectively, based on information provided in the Table 4.3.9 draft biological assessment <br />The CDOW also commented on the RN -04 application in 1996, and noted in their letter <br />that elk use of the permit and adjacent area had increased substantially in the years since <br />the original application had been prepared in the early 1980's. The Large Mammal section <br />of the Wildlife Inventory narrative in the permit application was updated to reflect the <br />increased elk use described by DOW. <br />The noxious weed control plan in Section 4.5.14 was amended via TR -15 in 2006 to include <br />the use of Curtail (for Canada thistle), Escort (for whitetop) and glyphosate (Roundup) (for <br />downy brome). Curtail and Escort are soil persistent, broadleaf selective herbicides <br />appropriate for the proposed use. Roundup is a non-persistent, broad spectrum herbicide, <br />appropriate for use on the topsoil stockpile to control downy brome prior to reseeding with <br />perennial grass. <br />The following specific findings are required. <br />A. The applicant has proposed the use of persistent pesticides on the site during mining <br />and/or reclamation operations. The Division proposes to approve this usage <br />(4.18(5)(g))• <br />B. Fish and wildlife habitat is a planned post -mining land use. The applicant has selected <br />appropriate plant species and distributions to benefit fish and wildlife (4.18(5)(i)). <br />XIII. PROTECTION OF UNDERGROUND MINING — RULE 4.19 <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.