Laserfiche WebLink
2/2/2017 <br />State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - New Elk TR -71 adequacy <br />Ron and Louis - <br />I am looking at Robin Reilley's letter (October 19, 2016), and I want to make a point of clarification and ask for additional <br />information. <br />At the top of her list of adequacy issues, she has the heading "Map Issues." As far as I can tell, only the first item <br />should be classified as a map issue. The other items are more than just "map issues." <br />Regarding adequacy item 4., 1 would like NECC to expand this explanation to discuss the expected quality of the water <br />to be injected underground and how there is no likely chance for this water to be detrimental to groundwater quality. <br />Thanks, <br />Rob <br />Rob b„. <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Coal Regulatory Program <br />P 303.866.3567, extension 6113 1 F 303.832,6106 <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 <br />rob.zuber@state.co.us I http://mining. state. co. us <br />https://mail.googl e.com/mail/b/511/u/0/?ui=2&i k=deb7fOcd20&view=pt&search= i nbox&th=159fab526da0f2ca&si m 1= 159Fab526da0f2ca 1 /1 <br />