Laserfiche WebLink
measurements from 1987 through 2000 and likewise reported, (see Table 2.05.6(3)-4 of the New <br />Horizon #2 Area permit), as taken at surface water site SW -N3. Table 2.05.6(3)-2b included in <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3)-2 shows this information for these as well as other sample points. <br />Table 2.05.6(3)-2 shows the predicted impact of the NHN backfill spring discharge on the <br />receiving waters of Tuttle Draw. During the irrigation season, the predicted TDS for Tuttle Draw <br />is an increase of about 9 mg/1 or about 0.5%. During the non -irrigation season the predicted TDS <br />for Tuttle Draw is an increase of 26 mg/1 or about 1.2%. <br />The spoil water inflows from NHN Mine will influence the quality of Tuttle Draw to a minor <br />degree. However, within about 2 miles, this flow enters the San Miguel River where the flow is <br />so much larger than the Tuttle Draw flow that the impact is negligible. Further, the water in <br />Tuttle Draw is too high in dissolved solids for domestic drinking water or for use in irrigation <br />without treatment. Also, these impacts are for the time when the spoil material is leaching salts at <br />a maximum. As described earlier, the TDS levels will drop over time as pyrite is oxidized and <br />other salts are leached out of the spoil which will lessen the impact to the waters downstream <br />over time. Six months prior to NHN Mine startup, monitoring of Spoil Spring #1, 001 discharge <br />site, and SW -N3 (on Tuttle Draw) will be resumed if at that time it has been suspended. The <br />approved "hydrologic monitoring plan" is described in Appendix 2.05.6(3)-3 at the end of this <br />section. <br />Impacts to receiving Waters — Meehan Draw <br />The Meehan Draw barrier pillar will serve as a dam of sorts (see discussion on "Spoil Water <br />Infiltration Into Low Wall" on page 23 above and Figure 2.05.6(3)-1) for water in the backfill of <br />the reclaimed pit. It is anticipated that water accumulating behind the low wall will eventually <br />issue as a "spoil spring", (Spoil Spring #4 (projected)). Based on the structure contour map (see <br />Map 2.04.6-1 in Section 2.04.6), the overburden depth, and the topography the expected location <br />of this spring is in the vicinity of NW 1/, SW 1/, NW 1/ of Section 25, T. 17 N., R. 16 W., (see <br />SS #4 Map 2.04.7-1 in Section 2.04.7). There are two basic differences in the spoil water that <br />will eventually issue from Spoil Spring #4 (SS#4): <br />• The area north of Meehan Draw will be reclaimed as "dry land pasture" and will <br />not be affected by the percolation of irrigation water. Therefore, water entering <br />the pit will be the result of seepage from the bedrock zones (due to the low <br />annual precipitation and high evaporation rate very little precipitation remains for <br />percolation). <br />• The quality of the water in the bedrock zones in the area north of Meehan Draw <br />is lower in TDS (see groundwater monitoring data in Appendix 2.04.7-1 of this <br />application) than the area north of the old highwall. <br />Section 2.05.6(3) Page 26 April 2016 (PR -01) <br />