My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-10-28_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (27)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2016-10-28_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (27)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 9:29:56 AM
Creation date
1/31/2017 9:52:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
10/28/2016
Doc Name
Protection of Hydrologic Balance
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3)
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ditch with a TDS of 500 mg/l and lower (although a slightly higher pH of 8.0 and higher) has no <br />detrimental effects on plants as witnessed by the success of irrigation in the area. <br />Since the early part of this century, it has been a regional practice to obtain water for irrigation <br />from the San Miguel River. Because of the incised nature of the drainage channels, it is difficult <br />to flood irrigate from them. From field reconnaissance investigations, no cases of water being <br />pumped from these draws for irrigation purposes, has been discovered. <br />Sub -irrigation A small amount of sub -irrigation does occur along the drainage channels. Much <br />of the ground water along these draws is a result of seepage through the weathered zone of the <br />bedrock from the irrigation ditches. In areas where the sub -irrigation occurs, the vegetation and <br />soil quickly dry up when the ditch is turned off from October to April. The sub -irrigation along <br />the drainage bottoms of the NHN permit area is not considered extensive enough to support <br />agricultural development. <br />Conclusion DRMS concluded in its Decision and Findings of Compliance Document (1983) for <br />Peabody's New Horizon Mine that no alluvial valley floors exist in either the New Horizon <br />permit area or the potentially affected area (Tuttle Draw) associated with the New Horizon Mine. <br />The tributaries of Tuttle Draw and Coal Creek Canyon are developed on and have incised a dip <br />slope. The water in the drainages runs on top of weathered bedrock strata. The incised channels, <br />with perennial flow, make it infeasible to construct a gravity flow flood irrigation system. NHN <br />therefore concludes that no alluvial valley floors exist along the potentially affected area of <br />Tuttle Draw and Coal Creek Canyon and their tributaries. This conclusion is substantiated by the <br />results of an EPA alluvial valley floor study (EPA 1977) which addresses most coal mining areas <br />of the west and the fact that flood irrigation from drainages is not being practiced. <br />Hydrology Monitoring Plan NHN has developed a baseline hydrological monitoring program <br />for the NHN Permit area with the advice and consent of DRMS. This monitoring program will <br />continue for the foreseeable future and is proposed to be used with possible minor modifications <br />during the mining and reclamation operations. The monitoring program is described in Appendix <br />2.05.6(3)-3 of this Section 2.05.6(3). <br />B) PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES <br />Previous mining by NHN at the New Horizon Mine and Peabody's experience while mining at <br />the old Nucla mine have provided the experience upon which the determinations of "Probable <br />Hydrologic Consequences" are founded. This experience is documented in the New Horizon 1 <br />and New Horizon 2 permit documents and the "Annual Hydrology" reports. The knowledge <br />provided by the long term hydrologic monitoring in relation to the earlier baseline data allows <br />more accurate prediction of consequences than would otherwise occur. Peabody Coal Company <br />performed extensive and detailed computer modeling to determine probable hydrologic <br />Section 2.05.6(3) Page 10 April 2016 (PR -01) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.