My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-01-23_PERMIT FILE - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2017-01-23_PERMIT FILE - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2017 3:05:02 PM
Creation date
1/26/2017 11:17:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/23/2017
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM11
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Volume II of IV <br /> Hvdrogeochemistry Evaluation/December 15,2015/Adrian Brown <br /> 3.4.2 Water Table <br /> 1. On pages 3 and 4 of Attachment 1,the text refers to an attached Plate 27.The Division <br /> could not find a Plate 27 in either the hard copy or the digital copy of the <br /> submittal. Please provide Plate 27. <br /> Response: Please see responses from Adrian Brown Consultants (ABC)provided in <br /> Attachment 5. <br /> 2. On page 3 of Attachment 1, footnotes 2 and 3 allege the Division is in error when <br /> referring to groundwater monitoring wells GVMW-22A and GVMW-22B. The <br /> footnotes state the Operator assumes the Division is referring to GVMW-23A <br /> and GVMW-23B. However, on the revised Figure 2-la — Surface Water and <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Locations submitted with the previous response, <br /> groundwater monitoring wells GVMW-23A and GVMW-23B are not shown. <br /> On this figure,GVMW-22A and GVMW-22B are shown to be compliance wells <br /> located in Grassy Valley. Please explain this discrepancy. <br /> Response: Please see responses from Adrian Brown Consultants (ABC)provided in <br /> Attachment 5. <br /> 3. The cross-section submitted on December 9th as Plate 29 does not show enough detail <br /> beneath the ECOSA to illustrate the relationship between the ECOSA, ECOSA <br /> underdrains, Grassy Valley perched aquifer, Grassy Valley Creek, and the <br /> portion of the area identified on Plate 9 (Rev. 1) as the "area where drainage <br /> tunnels do not cause significant head change in diatreme" which underlies the <br /> ECOSA. The vertical scale of the figure is too small to show the requested <br /> details. The Division did not request the Carlton Tunnel elevation be shown on <br /> this cross-section, as it is displayed on other figures submitted. Please increase <br /> the vertical scale of the figure as necessary to show sufficient detail for the <br /> requested features. The features of interest occur from surface to approximately <br /> 9,500 foot elevation(below the surface).Additionally,please ensure all features <br /> are labeled on the figure, including Grassy Valley Creek and monitoring wells, <br /> if appropriate. <br /> Response: Please see responses from Adrian Brown Consultants (ABC)provided in <br /> Attachment 5. <br /> 4. The cross-section submitted on December 9th as Plate 30 does not show enough detail <br /> to illustrate the relationship between the ECOSA, the Grassy Valley perched <br /> aquifer, Grassy Valley Creek, groundwater monitoring wells GVMW-8A and <br /> GVMW-8B, and the areas identified on Plate 9(Rev. 1) as "post-mining Grassy <br /> Valley capture zone" and"area where drainage tunnels do not cause significant <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.