My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-01-23_PERMIT FILE - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2017-01-23_PERMIT FILE - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2017 3:05:02 PM
Creation date
1/26/2017 11:17:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/23/2017
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM11
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Request#2: Confusion in Naming GVMW-22 and GVMW-23 <br /> On page 3 of Attachment 1, footnotes 2 and 3 allege the Division is in error when referring to <br /> groundwater monitoring wells GVMW-22A and GVMW-228. The footnotes state the Operator <br /> assumes the Division is referring to GVMW-23A and GVMW-23B. However, on the revised <br /> Figure 2-la — Surface Water and Groundwater Monitoring Locations submitted with the <br /> previous response, groundwater monitoring wells GVMW-23A and GVMW-23B are not <br /> shown. On this figure, GVMW-22A and GVMW-228 are shown to be compliance wells located <br /> in Grassy Valley. Please explain this discrepancy. <br /> Response <br /> The error which is referred to in the request was caused by ABC's incorrect labeling of GVMW-22 <br /> and GVMW-23 in the original submission. Our response attempted to correct this error, by stating <br /> exactly which wells we believed the DRMS question was referring to. The correct well locations <br /> are shown in Plate 27 (Rev.3) attached to this submission. ABC apologizes if our attempt to <br /> correct our mistake was read as a criticism of DRMS, which was not intended. <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.