Laserfiche WebLink
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS AND MATERIAL TESTING <br />Western Fuels <br />PO Box 628 <br />Nucla, Colorado <br />Attention: Mr. Frank Ferris, PE <br />November 8, 2016 <br />PN: M16043GE <br />Subject: Calculated Theoretical Slope Stability for the <br />Pond 018 Section A -A' <br />New Horizon Mine <br />Nucla, Colorado <br />Mr. Ferris: <br />It is our understanding the theoretical slope stability of <br />Section A -A' of Pond 018 is requested. This letter presents of <br />the theoretical slope stability analysis. <br />Section A -A' from the provided Pond 018 As -Built plans was used <br />for the analysis. The soil strength parameters were determined <br />by performing a direct shear strength test on the soil materials <br />delivered to our laboratory, results attached. <br />The stability of any slope is dependent on many factors. Typi- <br />cally the stability of a slope is analyzed by calculating the <br />anticipated gravitational forces that tend to drive the mass of <br />soil downhill and the anticipated internal strength of the soil <br />along the expected plane of failure that will resist the downhill <br />movements. If the driving forces are equal to or greater than <br />the resisting forces then failure is imminent. A theoretical <br />calculated factor of safety of 1.5 is considered by the geotech- <br />nical engineering industry as a minimum factor of safety for a <br />slope to be considered as stable. A calculated factor of safety <br />of 1.0 or less indicates that slope movement is imminent or in <br />process. Failure can occur as slow deformation, creep, or as a <br />somewhat spontaneous failure. <br />P.O.Box 3986 P.O.Box 45 <br />Grand Junction, Co. 81502 Montrose, Co. 81402 <br />(970) 245 6506 a970)24�164 <br />Attachment 2.05.3(3)-35 Page 2 cto er (TR -76) <br />