Laserfiche WebLink
1/12/2017 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Fwd: Bowie Coal Gasification Plant Proposal Is Not a Technical Revision <br />Warne IMairy J. Martin <br />Eimaill Address pakwamana@yahoo.com <br />Rhone INurnilbeir 970-856-0000 <br />City Cedaredge <br />State CO <br />zlip, 81413 <br />11 aim:: Other <br />Additional Since 1GCC plants use waste coal) and US coal) production its down, in time, such a pliant <br />Corniments wound be useless without waste coal) (not to mentiion that we acre exporting much of US coal) <br />to power OTHER couintiries).. Such plaints are allso more costly than coinventionall coall fired <br />plaints, so gasification would become anotheir corporate welfare burden on the faxpayeir, <br />relying on subsidies.. If we weigh the benefits of 1GCC plants against the daingeirs of theiir <br />contaminants, such as amrnoinia, mercury, hydrogen sulfide, and CO2, logically we have no <br />reason to even consider gasification in the North IFork.. This will not create sustaining jobs, <br />since coal) producIlion has been mostly automated, and in the long.-teirm such a plant will The <br />useless as the worid economy its stroingly reshaping itself around renewable einergy.. <br />Signature. Please <br />sligin using the <br />cursor lbellow -to <br />write your inarne.. <br />This digitall <br />signature !is <br />legally Iblindling <br />and coin -firms your <br />agreement wit1h <br />t1he corniment letter <br />a lb ove.. 'T In a in Ik yo u.. <br />Jason Musick <br />Environmental Protection Specialist III <br />Coal Regulatory Program <br />hftps:llmail.google.com/mail/b/5ll/ul0/?ui=2&ik=deb7fOcd2O&view=pt&search=inbox&th= 158fa684569ce6c2&siml= 158fa684569ce6c2 2/2 <br />