My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-01-09_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2017-01-09_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2020 6:37:01 AM
Creation date
1/10/2017 9:20:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/9/2017
Doc Name
Responses to Adequacy Review Comments #53 and #57 from 10/19/2016
From
Newmonth / CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM11
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ALEcological Resource Consultants, Inc. <br /> 35715 US Hwy.40,Suite D204^'Evergreen,CO^ 80439^ (303)679-4820 <br /> Technical Memorandum <br /> Date: December 21, 2016 <br /> To: Erik Munroe, Newmont <br /> E�PDO L <br /> Cc: Jay Janney-Moore, NewFields THa4;tis <br /> From: Troy Thompson, ERC <br /> 32913 =� <br /> .., <br /> Re: Chicago Tunnel Hydraulic Evaluation �pNAL ' <br /> Adequacy Items 53 and 57 for AM-11 <br /> Introduction <br /> Ecological Resource Consultants, Inc. (ERC) was tasked with evaluating sizing for the inlet channel, <br /> sediment pond and outlet channel at the Chicago Tunnel area of Newmont Mining Corporation's <br /> (Newmont) Cripple Creek&Victor(CC&V) gold mine. Our evaluation considered whether the previously <br /> constructed channels were sized adequately and whether the sediment pond spillway has capacity to <br /> safely pass the 100-year design flow. ERC utilized past SEDCAD analysis by Steffens and Associates, Inc. <br /> (Steffens)as the basis for our assessment. <br /> Hydrology <br /> ERC's assessment was based on the 100-year design storm event, which has a depth of 3.5 inches at this <br /> site (Steffens 2016). For the inlet channel to and the outlet channel from the sediment pond, peak flow <br /> values were provided by Steffens. The 100-year design flow for the inlet channel (Structure#5)was 7.04 <br /> cfs while the design flow for the outlet channel (Structure #4) was 43.26 cfs (Steffens 2016). For the <br /> sediment pond itself(Structure #6), the Steffens evaluation routed the design storm through an empty <br /> pond and determined that there would be no outflows. ERC conservatively assumed that the pond was <br /> full at the start of the event and that the pond didn't provide any reduction in peak flows. We therefore <br /> assumed that the sediment pond spillway would need to be able to safely pass the 100-year flow from <br /> the inlet channel of 7.04 cfs. Locations of Structures#4,#5 and#6 are called out below based on mapping <br /> generated by Steffens. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.