Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 2 <br /> Transit biix Daniels Pit Rash Fines Settling Pond Relocation <br /> Impacts of Existing Settling Pond on Ground Water Elevation <br /> Comparison of Water Table Trends in Upper-Sands Wells <br /> —Pond Full — —Pond Floor — ESCMW-17A ®SW-28A SW-31A SSW-35A <br /> 5,800 <br /> �- Existing settling pond placed in use. <br /> 5,790 ' <br /> y 5,780 I <br /> 0 <br /> o I <br /> M <br /> 5,770 -— <br /> _ <br /> � Ir <br /> v <br /> 5,760 I <br /> I <br /> 5,750 - - <br /> I <br /> 5,740 I .._.. <br /> 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 <br /> Year <br /> Comparison of Water Table Trends in Lower-Sands Wells <br /> —Pond Full —Pond Floor —ESCMW-16B �ESCMW-176 —SW-27 SW-28B SSW-30 SSW-31B SSW-35B <br /> 5,800 <br /> �- Existing settling pond placed in use. <br /> 5,790 I <br /> I <br /> v .5,780 I <br /> o I <br /> w 5,770 _I <br /> N . I <br /> F- <br /> N <br /> 3 5,760 <br /> 5,750 - .. ..a....,, ..�».�,. <br /> 5,740 <br /> 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 <br /> Year <br /> Dotes: <br /> 1) Ground water elevations and hydrogeologic connection information provided by Geosyntec. <br /> 2) Pond full elevation estimated as lowest ground surface elevation within the pond area,obtained from 10 meter DEM. <br /> 3) Pond floor elevation estimated as 30 feet below the frill elevation,based on a storage volume of 300 acre-feet and a surface area of 11 acres. <br /> - onsultants BISHOP-BROGDEN ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />