My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-01-09_REVISION - M1973007SG (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1973007
>
2017-01-09_REVISION - M1973007SG (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:23:40 PM
Creation date
1/10/2017 9:18:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973007SG
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/9/2017
Doc Name
Adequacy Response - Embankment Geotechnical Concerns
From
Transit Mix Concrete
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR5
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transit Mix <br /> 12/30/16 <br /> Page 5 <br /> As summarized in the above table the calculated factors of safety of the proposed wash fines <br /> embankment dam exceed the required factors of safety for slope stability for the evaluated <br /> loading conditions. <br /> Liquefaction Evaluation <br /> Brierley evaluated the liquefaction potential of the engineered embankment and embankment <br /> foundation. Liquefaction is a prevalent concern where materials utilized for embankment <br /> construction consist of loose, saturated sands or sensitive silts and if seismic potential exists at <br /> the site. <br /> Earthquakes cause ground motions that can cause structures to fail either through structural <br /> collapse or loss of ground support. The nearest fault to the property according the US <br /> Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program is the Ute Pass fault zone (age <750,000 <br /> years) approximately 5 miles to the west. According to Widmann (1998), a long term slip rate of <br /> <0.2 mm/year was estimated for this fault based on the small size of the scarps and the fact that <br /> the fault apparently has not ruptured since the initial deposition of the alluvium about 130,000 <br /> years ago. Brierley anticipates a minimal seismic risk potential for the proposed embankment <br /> within the design life of the pond. <br /> According to the literature, liquefiable sands often correlate to very loose soils with extremely <br /> low(less than 10) N-values. The average blow counts for the embankment foundation is 23 <br /> blows per foot which indicates a medium dense material. Based on medium dense blow counts <br /> and the material classifications in the foundation there is a minimal risk of liquefaction for in- <br /> place undisturbed materials at the site. <br /> The design report for the new embankment recommends that borrow material is obtained from <br /> the existing mine floor within the footprint of the new impoundment. Each lift in the embankment <br /> will be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. The borrow material should <br /> consists of the eolian soils with USCS classifications of SM, SC or CL. The coarse alluvium <br /> should not be used as borrow. The eolian deposits should be borrowed somewhat uniformly <br /> over the pit floor footprint such that the depth of excavation in any single location is not more <br /> than about 4 ft. The laboratory results for the eolian deposits are presented in the table below. <br /> Table 3. Summary of Laboratory Results for the Eolian Deposits <br /> Sample Location Atterberg <br /> Gravel Sand -200 Limits <br /> Boring Sample Depth M M N LL (%) pl (%) USCS <br /> No. No. feet <br /> BA-1 S-1 4 0.3 69.9 1 29.8 -- -- SM <br /> BA-2 S-4 19 5.6 66.5 27.9 -- -- SM <br /> BA-3 S-2 9 -- -- 71.1 32 1 15 CL <br /> BA-4 S-3 14 -- -- 69.8 28 1 12 CL <br /> Loose saturated granular soils such as sand, silty sand or clayey sand; and non-plastic silts <br /> within 50 feet of the surface and below the water table can be susceptible to liquefaction during <br /> cyclic loading such as exhibited during seismic events. Several methods were used to <br /> characterize the liquefaction susceptibility of the soils. The criteria are as follows: <br /> BRIERLEY <br /> ASSOCIATES <br /> Creating Space Underground <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.