My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-12-14_REVISION - C1996083 (84)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2016-12-14_REVISION - C1996083 (84)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2017 9:05:24 AM
Creation date
1/10/2017 8:29:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/14/2016
Doc Name
Public Comment
From
Troy Shenk
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR110
Email Name
JDM
MPB
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1/10/2017 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Fwd: Bowie Coal Gasification Plant Proposal Is Not a Technical Revision <br />STATE OF DRIVIS CoalAdmin - DNR, DNR <dnr drms coal_admin@state.co.us> <br />COLORADO, <br />......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... <br />Fwd: Bowie Coal Gasification Plant Proposal Is Not a Technical Revision <br />1 message <br />Musick - DNR, Jason <jason.musick@state.co.us> <br />To: DNR —DRMS—Coal—Admin <dnr—drms—coal—admin@state.co.us> <br />Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:19 AM <br />---------- Forwarded message ---------- <br />From: Citizens for a Healthy Community <word press @c it izensforahealthycom m unity. org> <br />Date: Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 9:11 AM <br />Subject: Bowie Coal Gasification Plant Proposal Is Not a Technical Revision <br />To: Ginny.brannon@state.co.us <br />Cc: jason.musick@state.co.us <br />The following comment letter was submitted by the named citizen through the website of the organization, Citizens for a <br />Healthy Community. It was submitted from the following page: http://www.citizensforahealthycommunity.org/bowie-coal- <br />gas if ication-plan L -proposal -comment <br />Please Dear Director Brannon, <br />checlk -the <br />(box (bellow It has come to my attention that lBowiie Resources, ILILC is proposing to turn their current lBowiie INo.. 2 <br />!if you coal) mining siite into a coal) gasificatiion plant. 1I allso understand that the technollogy being proposed is <br />agree to experinneintM and "patent pending".. <br />-the <br />following lBowie Resources iis proposing to make a significant change to its current mining permit (Permit No. <br />letter. A G-1996-083) through a "roufline" teclhnicall revision application (TIR-110). Bowie appears to be <br />checlk In proposing to construct what amounts to an oil) irefinery and possibly a new power plant. lBowie's <br />-the (box !is proposal) its to construct a COM gasification facility on iits (Bowie INo.. 2 coal) mine site.. <br />required iin <br />order -to As stated iin the company's application, the facility, known as a "DA7C10M Plant," 'W11 be used to <br />sulbirnit -the convert coal) mine waste to synthetic gas which its then used either to generate ellectiricall power or <br />-form -to -the diesel/fuel) oil.." The project proposal) envisions five coal) gasification units operating 24 hours a day, <br />IB IL M. and each capable of processing of 72 tons per day of coal) mine waste.. The plant would be Ihuiillt <br />where the lBowiie #2 Mine's clean coal) stockpile resides, after that stockpile its deplleted.. <br />Such a facility would represent a dramatic change within lBowiie's perrnit boundary, potentially turning <br />a coal) mining operation iinto a hydrocarbon refinery facility. A refinery its a very intensive, <br />coirnplicated, iriislky endeavor and at the end of the day iit's a very different operation'from coal) <br />mining. This is NOT aTeclhnicM Revision. What's moire, there appears to be little to no iinformatiion <br />derrionMrafling that Bowie W11 effectiivelly protect publliic health and the environment consistent with <br />Colorado coal) mining regulations. <br />1I aim 1pailiicullarlly concerned over the impacts that the proposal) 41 Ihave on wateir and aiir quality, <br />access to public lands and waters, fiish and wildlife, oin public (lands iin the area, and on the agrarian <br />character and quality of lliife of the INortlh Fork Valley. 1I respectfully request that IDIPINIS require 19owiie <br />Resources, ILILC to submit 11he appiropiriate Permit Revision application and Iholld a Ipublliic Iheariing on <br />the proposed plant. <br />(Date Decembeir 10, 2016 <br />Narne 'Troy Shenk <br />hftps:llmail.google.com/mail/b/5ll/ul0/?ui=2&ik=deb7fOcd2O&view=pt&search=inbox&th= 158fe8f73db3b2e5&siml= 158fe8f73db3b2e5 1/3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.