Laserfiche WebLink
'I V RESOURCE <br />\f HYDROGEOLOGIC <br />V SERVICES <br />Figure 3. Comparison of major ion concentrations in three alluvial monitoring wells in Hay Gulch <br />2,000 <br />J <br />£ 1,500 <br />c <br />0 <br />1,000 <br />c <br />v <br />c 500 <br />0 <br />U <br />M <br />2,000 <br />J <br />o\0 1,500 <br />E <br />0 <br />2,000 <br />J <br />1,500 <br />c' <br />O <br />1,000 <br />c <br />m <br />u <br />0 500 <br />U <br />M <br />Wiltse well <br />3/31/2016 6/23/2016 9/20/2016 11/29/2016 <br />■ Bicarb ■ SO4 NCI ■ Ca ■ Mg ■ Na ■ K <br />Well #1 Upgradient <br />3/30/2016 6/23/2016 9/21/2016 11/30/2016 <br />■ Bicarb 0504 OCI ■ Ca ■ Mg ■ Na ■ K <br />Well #2 Downgradient <br />3/30/2016 6/23/2016 9/21/2016 11/30/2016 <br />■ Bicarb ■ SO4 xC1 ■ Ca ■ Mg ■ Na ■ K <br />GCC ENERGY, LLC <br />2016 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT <br />20 <br />