My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-12-22_REVISION - M1980244 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-12-22_REVISION - M1980244 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2020 1:46:33 PM
Creation date
12/27/2016 9:15:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/22/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR86
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ERIC CC&V Poverty Gulch Diversion Channel Sizing <br /> December 2016 <br /> Table 1—Hydrologic Parameters <br /> Watershed Longest Flowpath Average Composite Initial Lag Time Peak <br /> Area(acres) Length(ft) Watershed Curve Abstraction(in) (min) Flow(cfs) <br /> Slope(%) Number <br /> 74 2,020 24.7 70.8 0.83 8.8 97 <br /> Hydraulic Design <br /> Based on the provided topography data,ERC established an approximate 616-foot-long diversion channel <br /> alignment that will allow the limits of the diversion to stay between the Amendment 10 disturbance <br /> boundary and the planned extents of the Globe Hill Pit perimeter. The plan and profile of the channel <br /> alignment is provided in Appendix A of this memorandum.Table 2 describes the profile of the alignment. <br /> ERC sized the diversion by inputting this profile along with the peak flow obtained from HEC-HMS into <br /> USACE's river analysis program HEC-RAS(v.5.0.3)to size the diversion and evaluate armor requirements. <br /> A trapezoidal channel with a 4-foot bed and 2:1 side slopes was selected. Because of the steep slopes of <br /> the channel and the corresponding velocities and shear stresses,armoring is required at all locations. ERC <br /> determined the Manning's roughness coefficient of the channel and the median riprap rock size(D5o)using <br /> the iterative process outlined by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA 2005). The Manning's <br /> roughness coefficient was found to vary between approximately 0.040 and 0.049 throughout the channel, <br /> depending on the slope and flow depth of each reach. ERC determined that a D50 of 18 inches will be <br /> adequate armoring at all stations of the diversion.A non-woven geotextile fabric filter is required below <br /> the riprap for filtering purposes(detail shown in Appendix A).Sizing results for the diversion channel are <br /> presented in Table 3.The design depth shown in this table includes%foot of freeboard at all locations. <br /> Table 2—Diversion Channel Profile <br /> Station Slope <br /> (ft/ft) <br /> 6+16 to 5+00 0.090 <br /> 5+00 to 3+00 0.120 <br /> 3+00 to 1+50 0.140 <br /> 1+50 to 0+00 0.070 <br /> Table 3—Diversion Channel Sizing Results <br /> Station Channel Bottom Channel Side Design Channel Top Riprap Riprap <br /> Width(ft) Slopes(X:1) Depth(ft) Width(ft) Dso(in) Thickness(in) <br /> 6+16to 0+00 4 2 2 12 18 36 <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.