My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-12-19_REVISION - M1980244 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-12-19_REVISION - M1980244 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2016 11:28:00 AM
Creation date
12/22/2016 11:12:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/19/2016
Doc Name
Responses to DRMS ECOSA Stability Review Comments
From
Newmont / CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM11
Email Name
TC1
AME
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Technical Memorandum <br />Newmont CC&V Gold Mine <br />East Cresson Overburden Storage Area Stability Review/Update <br />NewFields Job No. 475.0106.005 <br />9 December 2016 <br /> <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />2.0 SAMPLING AND MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION <br />A representative sample of colluvium was obtained from an exposed cut bank located <br />southwest of the ECOSA facility for laboratory testing, and the sample location is shown on <br />Figure 1. In addition, a sample of the overburden material was obtained from within the active <br />portions of the facility. <br />The particle size distribution and shear strength was measured in the laboratory for each <br />sample, and laboratory data sheets are included as Attachment A. Based on the laboratory <br />data, both the colluvium and overburden are 6‐inch minus material, with a dominant portion of <br />gravel‐sized particles and minimal fines. Both samples are considered non‐plastic. <br />Direct shear tests were run in an 8‐inch square shear box under saturated conditions. To <br />comply with ASTM D3080 test standards that provide guidance on maximum particle size as a <br />function of the shear box size, only minus ¾‐inch material was used for the test. Results of the <br />laboratory tests are summarized in Table 1.1. <br />Table 1.1 <br />Summary of Material Properties <br />Sample ID % <br />Gravel <br />% <br />Sand <br />% <br />Fines <br />USCS Group <br />Symbol <br />Friction Angle <br />(deg) <br />Cohesion <br />(psf) <br />Overburden 58.8 33.9 7.3 GP‐GM 41.4 361 <br />Colluvium 67.6 23.7 8.7 GP‐GM 40.1 0 <br /> <br />As a significant portion of the larger, gravel‐sized particles are removed from the test <br />specimens, the reported shear strengths are considered a conservative estimate and in‐place <br />materials at the ECOSA are likely more competent. <br />3.0 OVERBURDEN STORAGE AREA STABILITY EVALUATION <br />Stability analyses were performed using the computer program SLIDE 6 by Rocscience for static <br />and pseudo‐static conditions. SLIDE is a two‐dimensional slope stability program for evaluating <br />circular or noncircular failure surfaces in soil or rock slopes using limit equilibrium methods. <br />Spencer’s procedure, which is applicable for all slope geometries and soil profiles, was utilized <br />within the stability model and assumes all inter‐slice forces are parallel and have the same <br />inclination. <br />Minimum acceptable factors of safety (FOS) for static and pseudo‐static conditions were based <br />on criteria established by the Colorado Department of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS), <br />as follows:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.