My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-11-23_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2016-11-23_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2016 9:20:48 AM
Creation date
12/14/2016 9:13:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/23/2016
Doc Name
Cultural Resources Site Assessments
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 16 Exhibit 5, Item 5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY <br />Cultural Resource Re -Visitation Form <br />A Re -Visitation Form can only be used when a Management Data <br />Form and component forms have been previously filed with the <br />land managing agency and/or the Colorado Office of Archaeology <br />and Historic Preservation and no substantive changes to the <br />character of the site are required as a result of the current re - <br />visitation. Please use the Management Data Form and supporting <br />forms (archaeological component, linear, vandalism, etc.) when <br />changes are required to: <br />• Site type <br />• Linear resources <br />• Additional artifact assemblages and/or features <br />• Boundary size <br />• Vandalism <br />• NRHP recommendations <br />1. Resource Number: 5MF.4003 <br />3. Resource Name: <br />OAHP1405 <br />Rev. 11/10 <br />Official determination (OAHP use only) <br />❑Determined Eligible NR\SR <br />❑Determined Not Eligible NR\SR <br />❑Nominated <br />❑Need Data NR\SR <br />❑Contributing to NR Dist.\SR Dist. <br />❑Not Contributing to NR Dist.\SR Dist. <br />❑Supports overall linear eligibility NR\SR <br />❑Does not support overall linear eligibility NR\SR <br />2. Temporary Resource Number: <br />4. Project Name/Number: Colowyo Coal Company's Collom Expansion Project 2015 Site Revisit and Assessment <br />5. Government Involvement: ❑ Local ® State ❑ Federal <br />Agency: Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and Department of Reclamation, Mining, and <br />Safety <br />6. Site Categories: (Check as many as apply) <br />Prehistoric: ®Archaeological site ❑ Paleontological site <br />In existing National Register District? ❑ Yes ® Name: <br />No <br />Local Landmark? ❑ Yes ® No Name: <br />Historic: ®Archaeological site ❑Building (s) ❑ Structure(s) ❑Object(s) <br />In existing National Register District? ❑ Yes ® No Name: <br />Local Landmark? ❑ Yes ® No Name: <br />7. Owner(s) Name and Address: Colowyo Coal Company, 5731 Highway 13, Meeker, Colorado 81641 <br />8. Was the site relocated? ® Yes ❑ No If no, why? (100% collected in previous recording, ground disturbance, <br />etc.) <br />9. Previous recordings: <br />Site 5MF.4003 was originally recorded in 1995 by Metcalf Archaeological Consultants for the Colowyo Coal Company <br />Lease and Exploration Areas: Class III Cultural Resource Inventory project. The site was revisited in 2005 by TRC <br />Mariah Associates as part of the Collom Mine Expansion project. <br />10. Most recent National Register Eligibility Assessment: ❑ Eligible ❑ Not Eligible ® Need Data <br />Explain: <br />In 1995 site 5MF.4003 was recommended as needing more data during field evaluation by Metcalf Archaeological <br />Consultants, and this judgment was concurred on by TRC in 2005. Both companies argued that the prehistoric portion <br />of the site required subsurface testing in order to determine the extent of a suspected subsurface cultural component. <br />The historic portion of the site was recommended as non-contributing as it has no potential to further our understanding <br />of local or regional historic settlement, subsistence, or socioeconomic patterns. Tetra Tech concurs with the <br />recommendation that additional data is needed to determine the potential NRHP eligibility of the prehistoric component. <br />Tetra Tech also concurs that the historic component would not contribute to any potential a NRHP eligible <br />determination. The only significant impacts noted were the destruction of historic building/features 1 and 2 along with a <br />vegetation clearing event in the northern, historic component, part of the site. However, since the historic component is <br />non-contributing, the changes do not affect the overall integrity of the site. Integrity of the prehistoric component <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.