My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-11-23_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2016-11-23_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2016 9:20:48 AM
Creation date
12/14/2016 9:13:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/23/2016
Doc Name
Cultural Resources Site Assessments
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 16 Exhibit 5, Item 5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cultural Resource Site Assessments for Collom Expansion <br />5.1.2 Suitability Analysis Results <br />The suitability analysis defined 727 acres (approximately 30 percent) of the permitted disturbance <br />area as HPA (Table 4; Figure 25). The remaining permitted disturbance area acreage is classified <br />as MPA with 1,494 acres (approximately 62 percent) and LPA with 200 acres (approximately 8 <br />percent). <br />Table 4. Suitability Analysis Breakdown of Permit Area <br />Suitability Category <br />No. of Acres (% of total <br />High Potential Area (HPA) <br />727(30%) <br />Moderate Potential Area (MPA) <br />1,494(62%) <br />Low Potential Area (LPA) <br />200(8%) <br />As a test of the analysis, Tetra Tech extended the results across the entire Colowyo permit <br />boundary. The test compared all previously recorded site locations throughout the greater <br />Colowyo permit area to the analysis results. The comparison found the majority of previously <br />identified sites, and all previously identified sites reported to have a potential subsurface <br />components, are located in areas classified as HPA. Two exceptions to the analysis are rock <br />caims and prehistoric sites located on aeolian landforms. Rock cairns were constructed by <br />humans for a variety of purposes during both the prehistoric and historic -eras. The reported uses <br />tended to require cairn placement in high visibility areas typically not intensively utilized by human <br />populations for other activities. The sedimentary environments of the areas are also not conducive <br />to the burial and preservation of cultural resources. Therefore potential for the rock cairn sites to <br />contain intact subsurface components is low. No rock caims are present within the permitted <br />disturbance area. Aeolian landforms have a significant potential to bury and preserve subsurface <br />cultural material, such as at site 5MF.613O. Aeolian landforms, including sand sheets, shadows, <br />and dunes, form where soft bedrock is exposed to wind and surrounding topography winnows out <br />the wind eroded material to create the deposit. Tetra Tech determined that such aeolian <br />deposition was limited to the southern margins of the Axial Basin. No significant aeolian landforms <br />are present with the permitted disturbance area. Based on the analysis the potential for intact <br />subsurface cultural resources to be present is limited to defined HPA areas. The potential for the <br />MPA or LPA areas within the permitted disturbance area to yield such material is low. <br />Tetra Tech July 25, 2016 30 <br />For Official Use Only: Disclosure of Site Locations Prohibited (43 CFR 7 18) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.