My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-11-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2016-11-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2018 7:40:25 AM
Creation date
12/13/2016 9:17:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/18/2016
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2 Permits -ST
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />The Williams Fork Formation is the predominant coal -bearing unit in the Mesaverde Group. The coal <br />beds in the formation are uniformly distributed near the mine but generally vary in thickness and extent <br />away from the current Colowyo mine area. The coals are part of the Fairfield Coal Group. The natural, <br />pre -historic burning of underlying coal beds has baked areas of the Williams Fork Formation within the <br />permit area and the adjacent area. These surface areas are easily distinguished by their red -brown to <br />orange -brown color on the surface. These coal burns are known to extend into the rock for up to several <br />hundred feet. <br />The stratigraphic thickness of the Williams Fork Formation in the permit area is about 1,700 feet. <br />Although the formation contains some thick sandstone layers, the Twenty Mile Sandstone Member <br />(within the Williams Fork Formation in the Craig, Hayden, and Steamboat Springs areas) is not present in <br />the permit area. A facies change within the Williams Fork Formation has eliminated the Twenty Mile <br />Sandstone in the Danforth Hills Area. <br />A distinctive bed in the formation is a smectite layer, with an average thickness of two to three feet. <br />Formed from the deposition of a volcanic ash, Colowyo has identified this bed as the `Km'. (This bed <br />may be equivalent to the Yampa Bed in the Williams Fork to the north). The bed has been identified as <br />an aquiclude. This bed is approximately 165 feet above the top of the Trout Creek Sandstone. It <br />underlies the lowest seam proposed to be mined by at least 330 feet. Thus, there should be no impact <br />from the mining operations to the underlying Trout Creek Sandstone. <br />The upper Williams Fork Formation is composed of upper and middle deltaic sediments in the vicinity of <br />the Colowyo Mine. This is evidenced by an increase in mudstone and less continuous sandstone layers <br />than is found at other locations in the region (Kiteley, 1983; Geocid, 1998). Coarse-grained sediments in <br />the proposed mining area are typified by channel and bay -fill sandstones. These are of limited extent and <br />laterally discontinuous. <br />Structure <br />The regional geologic structure of the Danforth Hills is a complex of folds dominated by the Axial Basin <br />Uplift to the north of the existing Colowyo mine and South Taylor/Lower Wilson mining areas and the <br />Piceance Basin on the south. The Axial Basin Uplift, an anticline, or arch, is a southeastward extension <br />of the larger Uinta Mountain Arch to the west, which trends west by northwest. Between the Axial Basin <br />anticline and the basin is a series of synclines, anticlines, and monoclines. The permit area is located <br />between the Axial Basin anticline on the north and the Danforth Hills anticline /Wilson Creek dome to the <br />south. <br />The southern limb of the Axial Basin anticline is shared with the Collom Syncline. The current Colowyo <br />operation is on the southern flank of the Collom syncline. Southwest of the proposed permit area is the <br />Danforth Hills Anticline/Wilson Creek Dome. Southeast and east of the permit revision area is the <br />Elkhorn Syncline. A small unnamed anticline is located beneath the permit revision area. An unnamed <br />syncline exists along the West Fork of Good Spring Creek. These structures are affected by the Elkhorn <br />Syncline on the east, which results in an eastward to southeastward downward dip in the South Taylor <br />area (Map 7A). The springs in the West Fork of Good Spring Creek are the result of converging bedrock <br />dips caused by this unnamed syncline. <br />South Taylor/Lower Wilson — Rule 2, Page 12 Revision Date: 11/18/16 <br />Revision No.: MR -163 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.