Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br /> transect consisted of 50 stations. Since these were randomly selected each spring, the same plants were <br /> usually not evaluated from year to year. <br /> Data from the extensive browse transects are set forth in Table 2.04.11-2,Extensive Browse Transects. <br /> The investigator would walk ten paces, select the plant nearest his left or right foot and determine: first <br /> the condition of the plant (vigorous down to decadent) and second the amount of the current available <br /> growth (estimated)has been utilized to the nearest 10%. After 50 shrubs have been evaluated,the average <br /> percent utilization of each recorded species is calculated. <br /> The pellet group studies were conducted to determine the average daily use of browse species by season <br /> (expressed as days use per acre)and the percentage breakdown of utilization by deer,elk and cattle.Pellet <br /> group counts were conducted at each station on the intensive transects on lines paralleling the extensive <br /> transects, and in addition at two separate locations in the habitat improvement areas. There were ten pellet <br /> group plots or stations in each intensive transect. The pellet group plot transects consisted of 25 stations <br /> approximately 100 feet apart. Each pellet group plot was a circular area with an 11-foot 9-inch radius. <br /> The pellet group sampling consisted of counting and recording the number of pellet groups of deer,elk,or <br /> cattle within the plot each spring and fall. After they were counted, the pellet groups were swept off the <br /> plot to provide a clear base for the subsequent count. <br /> Information on pellet counts for deer, elk, and cattle in set forth in Table 2.04.11-3, Pellet Group Plot <br /> Transects For Deer, Elk and Cattle; Table 2.04.11-4,Pellet Group Plot Transects For Deer, Elk and Cattle <br /> -Habitat Improvement Areas; and Table 2.04.11-5,Pellet Group Plots-Intensive Transects. <br /> Observations through six winters have indicated there are more deer on the site when snows are minimal <br /> and, therefore, movement has not been limited. As the snows become increasingly deeper and conditions <br /> more severe, the deer either move to the sagebrush-covered south and southeast-facing exposures above <br /> Highway 13 adjacent to the mine site and Streeter Mountain, or they move out of the study area. <br /> The elk normally remain in areas from upper Taylor Creek to several areas in the permit area moving <br /> further downslope into Axial Basin only when snows become deep and foraging becomes difficult. <br /> However, a few scattered elk are normally observed within the study permit area regardless of snow <br /> depth. <br /> Data collected to date indicate that both deer and elk herds using the site and surrounding areas are in <br /> good condition, with a young age structure and good reproduction. This is especially evident in the fall, <br /> when high numbers of young bucks and bulls have been observed. <br /> Initial observations indicated the presence of suitable, traditional elk habitat located adjacent to the <br /> southwest of the Colowyo minesite in an area dominated by aspen and serviceberry as shown on the Big <br /> Game Use Information Map (Map 13). Information presented in the CDM report, as well as CPW <br /> information indicates this limited area located in the upper reaches of Taylor Creek is on the fringe of a <br /> much larger elk calving, nursery and summer range. The area is located in the west fork of Goodspring <br /> Creek, east fork of Wilson Creek and the Hole-in-the-Wall Gulch. Based on the data presented in the <br /> CDM report for the 1983 and 1984 calving/rearing seasons, this adjacent area likely provides habitat <br /> requirements for less than 0.1 percent of the White River herd. <br /> In personal conversations with CPW personnel, there is some indication that due to the expanding range <br /> of elk into nontraditional summer ranges, a trend is developing for elk to calve wherever they happen to <br /> be located at the time. Another surprising trend is occurring on elk winter ranges. Elk appear to be <br /> Rule 2 Permits 2.04.11-3 Revision Date: 10/3/16 <br /> Revision No.: MR-136 <br />