Laserfiche WebLink
Ground Water Impacts <br />TMI has monitored the quality and levels of ground water in mine backfill aquifers using wells GD -3, <br />GF -5, GF -7 and GF -11. These four wells were all included within the SL -4 Phase III bond release area. <br />However, because they are used as ash monitoring wells, they are still sampled and are representative of <br />backfilled aquifer conditions occurring in reclaimed blocks proposed for the SL -17 bond release <br />application. GD -3 and GF -11 show moderate increasing trends in TDS and sulfate concentrations, GF -7 <br />located in the backfill shows a larger impact, and GF -5, also located in the backfill, shows little <br />degradation. These differences in response may be due to the amount of underburden flow occurring in <br />each area, with GF -5 have great amounts of underburden flow and GF -7 having less influence resulting <br />in higher concentrations of monitored constituents. <br />Historical data from the backfill wells indicate leachate forms in the spoil/ash backfill. This leachate is <br />alkaline, and high in dissolved solids (TDS), mainly sulfates. This concentration may continue for several <br />hundred years, as predicted for the Seneca II Mine in Routt County, Colorado (USGS Water -Resources <br />Investigations Report 92-4187). The alkalinity (pH near 7) appears to have prevented significant <br />mobilization of metals in the spoil/ash backfill. <br />Upper Williams Fork Units that discharge to the shallow aquifer systems do not extend south into the <br />mine areas within the area request for release. <br />No impacts to adjudicated wells are anticipated in areas down -gradient of the land proposed for release. <br />Surface Water Impacts <br />Within the area of the proposed SL -17 bond release, surface water flows through eight different <br />watersheds. This includes discharges through eight active NPDES outfalls. The eight active discharge <br />points are all covered under NPDES Permit CO -0032115 and are in the following gulches: Johnson, No <br />Name, Coyote, Middle Pyeatt, East Pyeatt, Deer, West Pyeatt, and Oak. All runoff is primarily tributary <br />to the Yampa River, with a small amount from Deer Gulch going to the Williams Fork. <br />Surface water consistently discharges only through Johnson, No Name, East Pyeatt, and Oak Gulches. <br />The remaining discharge points seldom if ever record surface water runoff. Throughout the sampling <br />history of these discharge points, no violations of CO -0032115 standards have occurred. Recent Division <br />reviews of AHRs (from 2001 to 2015) indicate that there have been no significant water quality problems <br />at these discharge points. <br />No known spoil springs appear to be present on any of the reclaimed lands proposed for bond release in <br />SL -17. Spoil springs that were present at the down -gradient contact of spoils and non -mined areas in <br />Johnson and No Name Gulches were Phase III released in SL -4. <br />Compliance with Basic Standards for Ground Water <br />The absence of leachate plume development in the bedrock units indicates that for bedrock units in and <br />adjacent to the bond release area, the mine operator is in compliance with the Colorado Water Quality <br />Trapper Mine Page 12 November, 2016 <br />Phase III Bond Release (SL -17) <br />