My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-10-05_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2016-10-05_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2018 12:42:20 PM
Creation date
11/30/2016 11:11:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/5/2016
Doc Name
Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3) Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In regard to the agricultural water quality standards, the San Miguel River water delivered by the <br />irrigation ditches is more suitable for irrigation purposes than the waters in Tuttle or Calamity Draw. <br />The agricultural suitability (National Academy of Sciences, 1972) of surface water in Calamity and <br />Tuttle Draws falls within the category of water that can only be used for salt tolerant plants on <br />permeable soils with careful management practices (TDS from 2,000 to 5,000 mg/1). Using the <br />same classification system, water supplied by the West Lateral irrigation ditch (San Miguel River) <br />(TDS 500 mg/1 or lower) will have no detrimental effects on plants. Waters of Tuttle and Calamity <br />Draws have commonly exceeded the manganese and PH agricultural standards. <br />Since the early part of this century, it has been a regional practice to obtain water for irrigation from <br />the San Miguel River. Because of the incised nature of the stream channel, it is difficult to flood <br />irrigate from either Tuttle or Calamity Draw. From field reconnaissance investigations, it has also <br />been determined that water pumpage from these draws for irrigation purposes is occurring <br />infrequently. <br />Subirri ag tion <br />A small amount of subirrigation does occur along the Tuttle and Calamity Draw stream channels. <br />Much of the alluvial ground water along these draws is a result of seepage from the irrigation <br />ditches. In many areas where the subirrigation occurs, the vegetation and soil quickly dry up when <br />the ditch is turned off from October to April. The subirrigation along Tuttle or Calamity Draw is <br />not considered extensive enough to support agricultural development. <br />Conclusion <br />The DRMS concluded in its Decision and Findings of Compliance Document (1983) that no alluvial <br />valley floors exist in either the New Horizon permit area or the potentially affected area (Tuttle <br />Draw) associated with the New Horizon Mine. WFC concludes, based on the following criteria, that <br />no alluvial valley floors exist along the potentially affected area of Calamity Draw associated with <br />the New Horizon 2 mining area. Water availability, quality, the limited extent of the unconsolidated <br />streamlaid deposits and subirrigated areas, and the incised nature of Calamity Draw make it <br />infeasible and impractical to construct a flood irrigation system employing gravity drainage. This <br />conclusion is substantiated by the results of an EPA alluvial valley floor study (EPA 1977) which <br />addresses most coal mining areas of the west and the fact that flood irrigation is not being <br />practiced along Calamity Draw. <br />Finally, based on geomorphic criteria alone, neither Tuttle or Calamity Draws meet the necessary <br />criteria to be identified as alluvial valley floors, as they display geomorphic features that are <br />indicative of upland areas rather than alluvial valley floors. <br />July 2016 (TR -74) 2.05.6(3)-10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.