My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-10-20_PERMIT FILE - C1981035A (18)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2016-10-20_PERMIT FILE - C1981035A (18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2019 9:37:54 AM
Creation date
11/16/2016 1:41:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/20/2016
Doc Name
Cultural and Historic Resources Survey
Section_Exhibit Name
KII Appendix 03
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and enable the formulation of hypotheses towards a variety of research domains that can be accepted, <br />modified, or rejected by researchers. A low to moderate site density was expected in the Hay Gulch <br />vicinity based on record search results and small survey size. <br />4.3 Previous Investigations <br />On October 20, 2016, Paula Fluder of SEAS conducted a records search on COMPASS, Colorado's <br />online cultural resource database, to determine if any previously recorded sites occur within the project <br />area. Nine previously recorded sites are located within a one -mile radius of the proposed project (Table <br />4.1). Of the ten temporal components, one is an unspecified Native American open lithic site (10%), two <br />are historic habitations dating to the 1920s and 1930s (20%), and seven are mines (70%). None of the <br />sites are within or adjacent to the proposed monitoring well locations. <br />Table 4.1 Previously Recorded Sites Within a Mile of the Project Area <br />Site NumberT_ <br />Cultural Affiliation <br />Site Type <br />5LP 197 <br />1 1) Native American, unspecified <br />1) Open Lithic <br />--._.__....._..._.._._._............ <br />2) Unknown historic . <br />_..._........._................................ --- _ <br />; 2 Habitation _.__.._._.__._...._ <br />5LP 450 <br />Unknown historic --.....--- <br />I Habitation <br />---_._._..__... ---........ __.................... ............... <br />_ <br />5LP 1412 <br />................................... .___-.----............................._._....._.._..- <br />mine (Hay_ Gulch Mine)_ ................_.__ -__..._Mine <br />(tunnel) _....... ......... .................................. _._....... __............ _........ — <br />_ ..._.__..__._..._Historic <br />5LP 1414 <br />Historic mine (Minoletti Mine) <br />Mine (tunnel) <br />5LP 1415 <br />Historic mine (Peacock Mine No. —Mine <br />tunnel, tailings tipple) — _ <br />5LP 1416 <br />Historic mine (Burnwell No. 1 and 2) <br />Mine (tailings, powder house, tipple, <br />tun_ne_I) <br />--------..................._...._._._._._.._...._ <br />5LP 1417 <br />.._......_.......-....._....__.._.............._._..._.-_ _ ..__.. <br />Historic mine Durkan Mine <br />_. <br />I Mine tunnel, tailing s <br />5LP 1418 <br />Historic mine (Tipotsch..Mine)-- <br />I—Mine (tunnel, tailings) _._._ ............................. ..... _......... _ <br />- _ <br />5LP 4584 <br />.......................- --- - <br />Historic mine Blue Flame <br />; Coal mine <br />4.4 Methodoloav and Definitions <br />The APE for GCC Energy's proposed Groundwater Monitoring Wells Project is 0.23 acre. The total area <br />surveyed is 2.58 acres. All parcels were surveyed for cultural resources by walking parallel transects <br />space no more than 15 meters apart to cover 100 percent of the project areas and buffer zones. <br />For this inventory, a site was defined as any manifestation of past human activity consisting of a feature <br />and /or 10 or more artifacts. An isolated find is defined as one to nine artifacts in a definable space not <br />associated with a feature or structure, typically representing an isolated event or expedient activity. <br />However, site and IF definitions are guidelines only and all cultural manifestations are individually <br />evaluated for data potential. All field notes, maps, photographs, and inventory documents are on file at <br />the SEAS office in Ignacio, Colorado. Sites are mapped, photographed, and site forms completed. <br />Artifact inventory forms are completed with exact counts for artifact classes up to 100 items. For sites <br />with more than 100 artifacts in any artifact class, field analysis may include 100 or more items per artifact <br />class, until the nature of the assemblage has been adequately characterized. A primary flake is defined as <br />having 100 percent cortex on the dorsal surface; a secondary flake is defined as having 1 to 99 percent <br />cortex on the dorsal surface; a tertiary flake is defined as having no cortex on the dorsal surface. Bifacial <br />thinning flakes are recognized by faceted, retouched, or lipped platforms, diffuse bulbs, thin cross <br />sections, multiple flake scars paralleling the dorsal surface margin, and eraillures. Pressure flakes are <br />small (less than 1 cm), thin, and usually non-cortical with a high frequency of collapsed platforms. Many <br />An Intensive CRI for GCC Energy's Proposed Groundwater Monitoring Wells <br />on State and Private Lands in La Plata County, CO <br />SEAS 16-098 October 2016 <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.