My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-11-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1992081
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1992081
>
2016-11-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1992081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 1:13:58 PM
Creation date
11/10/2016 10:32:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/2/2016
Doc Name
Fifth Omnibus Motion of the Debtors for an Order
From
United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern Disctrict of Missouri Eastern Division
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DIH
JRS
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 16-42529 Doc 1478 Filed 10/24/16 Entered 10/24/16 20:24:17 Main Document <br />Pg 16 of 99 <br />judgment that the benefits associated with assuming and servicing the Assumed Leases <br />significantly outweigh the costs at this time, and such assumption provides the Debtors' estates <br />with certainty in formulating and implementing a restructuring plan. <br />33. For all of these reasons, the Debtors believe that the assumption of the Assumed <br />Leases is proper under the circumstances and should be approved. Moreover, the Debtors submit <br />that the payment of the Cure Costs will fully satisfy the Debtors' obligations to cure outstanding <br />defaults under the Assumed Leases, pursuant to section 365(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, and <br />should be approved. <br />34. Similarly, the Debtors' proposed rejection of the Rejected Leases is also an <br />appropriate exercise of the Debtors' business judgment, as the Rejected Leases either provide <br />no ongoing benefit to the Debtors' estates or provide benefits that are substantially less than the <br />corresponding costs of continuing to operate under the terms thereof. Rejecting the Rejected <br />Leases will save the Debtors millions of dollars in the aggregate and, for all the reasons set forth <br />herein, is clearly beneficial to the Debtors' estates and creditors. The Debtors have thoroughly <br />considered the available alternatives to rejection of the Rejected Leases and believe that the relief <br />requested herein is most likely to maximize the value of the Debtors' estates. <br />35. In light of the foregoing, the Debtors respectfully request that the Court approve <br />rejection of the Rejected Leases pursuant to section 365(a) of the Bankruptcy Code as a sound <br />exercise of their business judgment. <br />The Debtors Have Satisfied Any Applicable Requirements of Section 365(b) <br />36. Pursuant to section 365(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, if there has been a default <br />in an unexpired lease, a debtor may not assume such lease unless, at the time of assumption of <br />such lease, the debtor (a) cures or provides adequate assurance that it will promptly cure the <br />NAI -1502082594v7 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.